Literature DB >> 34734139

Revision pedicle screws with impaction bone grafting: a case series.

Matthew Alexander Lea1, Mahmoud Elmalky1,2, Silviu Sabou1, Irfan Siddique1, Rajat Verma1, Saeed Mohammad1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pedicle screw fixation in spinal constructs can be subject to failure requiring revision surgery. In cases of aseptic loosening various salvage techniques have been described. Revision screws augmented with cement have become popular but are not without risks. Larger diameter screws are often used but result in reducing bone stock or expanding the pedicles. We present a novel technique of pedicle screw revision by impaction bone allografting and a case series.
METHODS: The failed screws are removed. The screw track is probed to check its integrity. Milled bone allograft is funneled into the screw hole and sequentially impacted, before insertion of a replacement screw. We report a case series and describe a single case where this method has been used. Information was gathered from the electronic patient record in our hospital.
RESULTS: Ten screws were revised in 7 patients. Mean age at first surgery was 60.86 (48-76) years. Average time between first surgery and revision was 12.6 (4.7-49.9) months. Average follow-up was 26.2 (5.7-62.2) months and no screws showed any signs of loosening.
CONCLUSIONS: Impaction grafting with bone allograft is a technique for pedicle screw salvage that can be used safely and effectively as an alternative to cemented screws, when pedicle screws have failed by aseptic loosening. It avoids the risks associated with cemented screws and in our series was successful. 2021 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pedicle; bone graft; revision; screw

Year:  2021        PMID: 34734139      PMCID: PMC8511565          DOI: 10.21037/jss-20-684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  23 in total

1.  High frequency of low-virulent microorganisms detected by sonication of pedicle screws: a potential cause for implant failure.

Authors:  Vincent Prinz; Simon Bayerl; Nora Renz; Andrej Trampuz; Marcus Czabanka; Johannes Woitzik; Peter Vajkoczy; Tobias Finger
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2019-05-28

2.  Pedicle screw loosening is correlated to chronic subclinical deep implant infection: a retrospective database analysis.

Authors:  Lukas Leitner; Isabella Malaj; Patrick Sadoghi; Florian Amerstorfer; Mathias Glehr; Klaus Vander; Andreas Leithner; Roman Radl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hyun W Bae; Sean S Rajaee; Linda E Kanim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Low-Grade Infection and Implant Failure Following Spinal Instrumentation: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ehab Shiban; Ann-Kathrin Joerger; Insa Janssen; Mohammed Issa; Nicole Lange; Arthur Wagner; Susanne Feihl; Florian Ringel; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Static and cyclical biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw spinal constructs.

Authors:  B W Cunningham; J C Sefter; Y Shono; P C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Pedicle screw design and cement augmentation in osteoporotic vertebrae: effects of fenestrations and cement viscosity on fixation and extraction.

Authors:  Theodore J Choma; Ferris M Pfeiffer; Ryan W Swope; Jesse P Hirner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Load-bearing increases new bone formation in impacted and morselized allografts.

Authors:  J S Wang; M Tägil; P Aspenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of a novel fenestrated pedicle screw augmented with bone cement in osteoporotic spines.

Authors:  Philippe E Paré; James L Chappuis; Raja Rampersaud; Amit O Agarwala; Joseph H Perra; Serkan Erkan; Chunhui Wu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Bone graft incorporation. Effects of osteogenic protein-1 and impaction.

Authors:  M Tägil; C Jeppsson; P Aspenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Revision of failed pedicle screws using hydroxyapatite cement. A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  S A Yerby; E Toh; R F McLain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.