Literature DB >> 31481443

Amikacin Initial Dose in Critically Ill Patients: a Nonparametric Approach To Optimize A Priori Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainments in Individual Patients.

Clément Boidin1,2, Laurent Bourguignon1,2,3, Sabine Cohen4, Claire Roger5,6, Jean-Yves Lefrant5,6, Jason A Roberts7,8, Bernard Allaouchiche9,10,11, Alain Lepape9,12, Arnaud Friggeri9,11,12, Sylvain Goutelle13,2,3.   

Abstract

Amikacin is commonly used for probabilistic antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients with sepsis. Its narrow therapeutic margin makes it challenging to determine the right individual dose that ensures the highest efficacy target attainment rate (TAR) in this setting. This study aims to develop a new initial dosing approach for amikacin by optimizing the a priori TAR in this population. A population pharmacokinetic model was built with a learning data set from critically ill patients who received amikacin. It was then used to design an initial dosing approach maximizing a priori TAR for a target ratio of ≥8 for the peak concentration to the MIC (C max/MIC) or of ≥75 for the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h to the MIC (AUC0-24/MIC). In the 166 patients included, 53% had amikacin C max of ≥64 mg/liter with a median dose of 23.4 mg/kg. A two-compartment model with creatinine clearance and body surface area as covariates best described the data and showed good predictive performance. Our dosing approach was successful in optimizing TAR for C max/MIC, with a rate of 92.9% versus 67.9% using a 30-mg/kg regimen, based on an external subset of data and assuming a MIC of 8 mg/liter. Mean optimal doses were higher (3.5 ± 0.5 g) than with the 30-mg/kg regimen (2.1 ± 0.3 g). Suggested doses varied with the MIC, the target index, and desired TAR threshold. A dosing algorithm based on the method is proposed for a large range of patient covariates. Clinical studies are necessary to confirm efficacy and safety of this optimized dosing approach.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amikacin; intensive care; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31481443      PMCID: PMC6811403          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00993-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  43 in total

1.  The origin of the "ideal" body weight equations.

Authors:  M P Pai; F P Paloucek
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.154

2.  Estimation of fluid status changes in critically ill patients: fluid balance chart or electronic bed weight?

Authors:  Antoine G Schneider; Ian Baldwin; Elke Freitag; Neil Glassford; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Glomerular hyperfiltration and albuminuria in critically ill patients.

Authors:  O Fuster-Lluch; M Gerónimo-Pardo; R Peyró-García; M Lizán-García
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 4.  Amikacin use and therapeutic drug monitoring in adults: do dose regimens and drug exposures affect either outcome or adverse events? A systematic review.

Authors:  Abi Jenkins; Alison H Thomson; Nicholas M Brown; Yvonne Semple; Christine Sluman; Alasdair MacGowan; Andrew M Lovering; Phil J Wiffen
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Standard dosing of amikacin and gentamicin in critically ill patients results in variable and subtherapeutic concentrations.

Authors:  Claire Roger; Bastian Nucci; Nicolas Molinari; Sophie Bastide; Gilbert Saissi; Gael Pradel; Saber Barbar; Clément Aubert; Sophie Lloret; Loubna Elotmani; Anne Polge; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Jason A Roberts; Laurent Muller
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 6.  Antibacterial dosing in intensive care: pharmacokinetics, degree of disease and pharmacodynamics of sepsis.

Authors:  Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Estimation of creatinine clearance in patients with unstable renal function, without a urine specimen.

Authors:  Roger Jelliffe
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 8.  Anti-infective Dosing for Obese Adult Patients: A Focus on Newer Drugs to Treat Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

Authors:  Manjunath P Pai
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  High creatinine clearance in critically ill patients with community-acquired acute infectious meningitis.

Authors:  Alexandre Lautrette; Thuy-Nga Phan; Lemlih Ouchchane; Ali Aithssain; Vincent Tixier; Anne-Elisabeth Heng; Bertrand Souweine
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  A comparison of CKD-EPI estimated glomerular filtration rate and measured creatinine clearance in recently admitted critically ill patients with normal plasma creatinine concentrations.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Fraser J A Morton; Sallyanne Nguyen-Pham; Paul Jarrett; Melissa Lassig-Smith; Janine Stuart; Rachel Dunlop; Therese Starr; Robert J Boots; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.388

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cefepime Precision Dosing Tool: from Standard to Precise Dose Using Nonparametric Population Pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Mohammad H Alshaer; Sylvain Goutelle; Barbara A Santevecchi; Bethany R Shoulders; Veena Venugopalan; Kartikeya Cherabuddi; Jiajun Liu; Patrick J Kiel; Jason A Roberts; Fekade Bruck Sime; Marc H Scheetz; Michael N Neely; Charles A Peloquin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.938

2.  Population Pharmacokinetic Study of the Suitability of Standard Dosing Regimens of Amikacin in Critically Ill Patients with Open-Abdomen and Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy.

Authors:  Cédric Carrié; Faustine Delzor; Stéphanie Roure; Vincent Dubuisson; Laurent Petit; Mathieu Molimard; Dominique Breilh; Matthieu Biais
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin Administered Once Daily in Patients with Different Renal Functions.

Authors:  Norma A Aréchiga-Alvarado; Susanna E Medellín-Garibay; Rosa Del C Milán-Segovia; Arturo Ortiz-Álvarez; Martín Magaña-Aquino; Silvia Romano-Moreno
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Aminoglycosides in the Intensive Care Unit: What Is New in Population PK Modeling?

Authors:  Alexandre Duong; Chantale Simard; Yi Le Wang; David Williamson; Amélie Marsot
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  Evaluation of amikacin dosing schedule in critically ill elderly patients with different stages of renal dysfunction.

Authors:  Saeideh Ghaffari; Ali Mohammad Hadi; Farhad Najmeddin; Bita Shahrami; Mohammad-Reza Rouini; Atabak Najafi; Mojtaba Mojtahedzadeh
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2021-09-29

6.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Patients on Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Authors:  Claire Pressiat; Agathe Kudela; Quentin De Roux; Nihel Khoudour; Claire Alessandri; Hakim Haouache; Dominique Vodovar; Paul-Louis Woerther; Alice Hutin; Bijan Ghaleh; Anne Hulin; Nicolas Mongardon
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Dosing Simulations of Tobramycin in Pediatric Patients with Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Antonin Praet; Laurent Bourguignon; Florence Vetele; Valentine Breant; Charlotte Genestet; Oana Dumitrescu; Anne Doleans-Jordheim; Philippe Reix; Sylvain Goutelle
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Quantification and Explanation of the Variability of First-Dose Amikacin Concentrations in Critically Ill Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department: A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis.

Authors:  Sabrina De Winter; Reinier van Hest; Erwin Dreesen; Pieter Annaert; Joost Wauters; Wouter Meersseman; Nele Van den Eede; Stefanie Desmet; Sandra Verelst; Peter Vanbrabant; Willy Peetermans; Isabel Spriet
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.441

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.