Literature DB >> 31711904

In utero DDT exposure and breast density before age 50.

Nickilou Y Krigbaum1, Piera M Cirillo2, Julie D Flom3, Jasmine A McDonald3, Mary Beth Terry3, Barbara A Cohn2.   

Abstract

Prior studies in the Child Health and Development Studies (CHDS) found in utero exposure to the pesticide, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), increased breast cancer risk by age 52. Mammographic density is considered a primary risk factor for breast cancer. We conducted a study of 309 daughters from the CHDS to examine in utero DDT exposure and mammographic density in midlife. Among daughters with high (>75th percentile) exposure to p,p'-Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), p,p'-DDT was significantly correlated with increased dense area and percent density regardless of her body mass in midlife. In the subset of women with lower (<75th percentile) p,p-DDE, p,p'-DDT was associated with increased non-dense breast area. This was explained by adjustment for midlife BMI suggesting that p,p'-DDT may be obesogenic. In aggregate our findings indicate that early life p,p'-DDT exposure impacts breast density in a complex way that depends on the hosts biological ability to sequester and process DDT and levels of exposure.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Child health and development studies (CHDS); Dense area; Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT); In utero exposure; Mammographic breast density; Non-dense area; Percent density

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31711904      PMCID: PMC7205591          DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Toxicol        ISSN: 0890-6238            Impact factor:   3.143


  46 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic density as a marker of susceptibility to breast cancer: a hypothesis.

Authors:  N F Boyd; G A Lockwood; L J Martin; J W Byng; M J Yaffe; D L Tritchler
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  2001

2.  Nature's chemicals and synthetic chemicals: comparative toxicology.

Authors:  B N Ames; M Profet; L S Gold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The California Child Health and Development Studies of the School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley.

Authors:  B J van den Berg; R E Christianson; F W Oechsli
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  Effect of a single oral dose of DDT on lipid metabolism in protein-calorie malnourished monkeys.

Authors:  S Sanyal; N Agarwal; P K Dudeja; A Mahmood; D Subrahmanyam
Journal:  Indian J Biochem Biophys       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.918

5.  Plasma organochlorine levels and the risk of breast cancer: an extended follow-up in the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  F Laden; S E Hankinson; M S Wolff; G A Colditz; W C Willett; F E Speizer; D J Hunter
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Childhood obesity and environmental chemicals.

Authors:  Michele La Merrill; Linda S Birnbaum
Journal:  Mt Sinai J Med       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb

7.  Assaying organochlorines in archived serum for a large, long-term cohort: implications of combining assay results from multiple laboratories over time.

Authors:  Robert I Sholtz; Katherine R McLaughlin; Piera M Cirillo; Myrto Petreas; June-Soo Park; Mary S Wolff; Pam Factor-Litvak; Brenda Eskenazi; Nickilou Krigbaum; Barbara A Cohn
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 8.  Mutagenesis and carcinogenesis: endogenous and exogenous factors.

Authors:  B N Ames
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Prenatal concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls, DDE, and DDT and overweight in children: a prospective birth cohort study.

Authors:  Damaskini Valvi; Michelle A Mendez; David Martinez; Joan O Grimalt; Maties Torrent; Jordi Sunyer; Martine Vrijheid
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Assessing the Public Health Implications of the Food Preservative Propylparaben: Has This Chemical Been Safely Used for Decades.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Jennifer Bugos
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 2.  Chemical Effects on Breast Development, Function, and Cancer Risk: Existing Knowledge and New Opportunities.

Authors:  Jennifer E Kay; Bethsaida Cardona; Ruthann A Rudel; Laura N Vandenberg; Ana M Soto; Sofie Christiansen; Linda S Birnbaum; Suzanne E Fenton
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-08-19

3.  CHDS: A national treasure that keeps on giving.

Authors:  Suzanne E Fenton; Linda S Birnbaum
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  A vision for exposome epidemiology: The pregnancy exposome in relation to breast cancer in the Child Health and Development Studies.

Authors:  Dean P Jones; Barbara A Cohn
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  Breast and prostate glands affected by environmental substances (Review).

Authors:  Tammy C Bleak; Gloria M Calaf
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 6.  Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals' (EDCs) Effects on Tumour Microenvironment and Cancer Progression: Emerging Contribution of RACK1.

Authors:  Erica Buoso; Mirco Masi; Marco Racchi; Emanuela Corsini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Environmental Influences on Mammographic Breast Density in California: A Strategy to Reduce Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Barbara A Cohn; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.