Literature DB >> 8222887

Young children's understanding of the mind-body distinction.

K Inagaki1, G Hatano.   

Abstract

A experiments investigated children's understanding of the mind-body distinction. Children of ages 4 and 5 recognized not only the differential modifiability of changeable versus unchangeable human properties and bodily versus mental properties, but also the independence of activities of bodily organs from a person's intention (Experiment 1). When presented 3 types of causal explanations (i.e., intentional, vitalistic, mechanical), 6-year-olds chose most often as most plausible for bodily functions vitalistic explanations (i.e., those ascribing the phenomena to a relevant bodily organ's initiative and effortful engagement in activity); 8-year-olds chose the vitalistic explanations second most often, following mechanical ones (Experiment 2). However, 6-year-olds, as well as 8-year-olds and adults, did not always choose vitalistic explanations over intentional explanations (Experiment 3); whereas they tended to prefer vitalistic explanations for biological phenomena, they predominantly accepted intentional ones for psychological phenomena (Experiment 3A). These results suggest that children as young as 6 years of age have acquired a form of biology as an autonomous domain which is separate from that of psychology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8222887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  13 in total

1.  Sensing the coherence of biology in contrast to psychology: young children's use of causal relations to distinguish two foundational domains.

Authors:  Jane E Erickson; Frank C Keil; Kristi L Lockhart
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

2.  The Blicket Within: Preschoolers' Inferences About Insides and Causes.

Authors:  David M Sobel; Caroline M Yoachim; Alison Gopnik; Andrew N Meltzoff; Emily J Blumenthal
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2007

3.  Young infants have biological expectations about animals.

Authors:  Peipei Setoh; Di Wu; Renée Baillargeon; Rochel Gelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Developmental Origins of Biological Explanations: The case of infants' internal property bias.

Authors:  Hernando Taborda-Osorio; Erik W Cheries
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

5.  Examining explanatory biases in young children's biological reasoning.

Authors:  Cristine H Legare; Brooke Schepp; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2014

6.  Effects of explaining on children's preference for simpler hypotheses.

Authors:  Caren M Walker; Elizabeth Bonawitz; Tania Lombrozo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

7.  When to Cry Over Spilled Milk: Young Children's Use of Category Information to Guide Inferences About Ambiguous Behavior.

Authors:  Jessica W Giles; Gail D Heyman
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2004-08

8.  Mental Health Clinicians' Beliefs About the Biological, Psychological, and Environmental Bases of Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Woo-Kyoung Ahn; Caroline C Proctor; Elizabeth H Flanagan
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-03

9.  Idiom comprehension in Mandarin-speaking children.

Authors:  Shelley Ching-Yu Hsieh; Chun-Chieh Natalie Hsu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-12

10.  The Importance of Discovery in Children's Causal Learning from Interventions.

Authors:  David M Sobel; Jessica A Sommerville
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.