Literature DB >> 20411158

Mental Health Clinicians' Beliefs About the Biological, Psychological, and Environmental Bases of Mental Disorders.

Woo-Kyoung Ahn1, Caroline C Proctor, Elizabeth H Flanagan.   

Abstract

The current experiments examine mental health clinicians' beliefs about biological, psychological, and environmental bases of the DSM-IV-TR mental disorders and the consequences of those causal beliefs for judging treatment effectiveness. Study 1 found a large negative correlation between clinicians' beliefs about biological bases and environmental/psychological bases, suggesting that clinicians conceptualize mental disorders along a single continuum spanning from highly biological disorders (e.g., autistic disorder) to highly nonbiological disorders (e.g., adjustment disorders). Study 2 replicated this finding by having clinicians list what they thought were the specific causes of nine familiar mental disorders and rate their bio-psycho-environmental bases. Study 3 further found that clinicians believe medication to be more effective for biologically based mental disorders and psychotherapy to be more effective for psychosocially based mental disorders. These results demonstrate that even expert mental health clinicians make strong distinctions between psychological and biological phenomena.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20411158      PMCID: PMC2857376          DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01008.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  34 in total

1.  Perceptions of Mental and Physical Illnesses in North-western Ethiopia: Causes, Treatments, and Attitudes.

Authors:  M S Mulatu
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  1999-07

2.  Public conceptions of serious mental illness and substance abuse, their causes and treatments: findings from the 1996 general social survey.

Authors:  Sara Kuppin; Richard M Carpiano
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Emerging paradigms in medicine: implications for the future of psychiatry.

Authors:  James Lake
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.775

Review 4.  A new intellectual framework for psychiatry.

Authors:  E R Kandel
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance.

Authors:  B G Link; J C Phelan; M Bresnahan; A Stueve; B A Pescosolido
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Children's understanding of psychogenic bodily reactions.

Authors:  P C Notaro; S A Gelman; M A Zimmerman
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

7.  The effect of personal experience with mental illness on the attitude towards individuals suffering from mental disorders.

Authors:  M C Angermeyer; H Matschinger
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.328

8.  Common-sense models of illness: the example of hypertension.

Authors:  D Meyer; H Leventhal; M Gutmann
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor's reach.

Authors:  A L Woodward
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-11

10.  Public beliefs about treatment and outcome of mental disorders: a comparison of Australia and Japan.

Authors:  Anthony F Jorm; Yoshibumi Nakane; Helen Christensen; Kumiko Yoshioka; Kathleen M Griffiths; Yuji Wata
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2005-07-09       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  25 in total

1.  Proportionate responses to life events influence clinicians' judgments of psychological abnormality.

Authors:  Nancy S Kim; Daniel J Paulus; Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Danielle Khalife
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2011-12-05

2.  The philosophies of psychiatry: empirical perspectives.

Authors:  Alan S G Ralston
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-08

3.  The influence of framing on clinicians' judgments of the biological basis of behaviors.

Authors:  Nancy S Kim; Woo-kyoung Ahn; Samuel G B Johnson; Joshua Knobe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2015-12-14

4.  Blue Genes? Understanding and Mitigating Negative Consequences of Personalized Information about Genetic Risk for Depression.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Woo-Kyoung Ahn
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Effects of biological explanations for mental disorders on clinicians' empathy.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Woo-kyoung Ahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Biomedical Explanations of Psychopathology and Their Implications for Attitudes and Beliefs About Mental Disorders.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 18.561

7.  Beneficial and detrimental effects of genetic explanations for addiction.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Int J Soc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-10-23

8.  'Folk theories' about the causes of insomnia.

Authors:  Allison G Harvey; Adriane Soehner; Tania Lombrozo; Lynda Bélanger; Jamie Rifkin; Charles M Morin
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2013-10-01

9.  Relationships of biomedical beliefs about depression to treatment-related expectancies in a treatment-seeking sample.

Authors:  Matthew S Lebowitz; Tohar Dolev-Amit; Sigal Zilcha-Mano
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2021-02-04

10.  Thinking you can catch mental illness: how beliefs about membership attainment and category structure influence interactions with mental health category members.

Authors:  Jessecae K Marsh; Lindzi L Shanks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.