Literature DB >> 8216645

Introduction of total quality management (TQM) into an internal medicine residency.

A G Ellrodt1.   

Abstract

In spite of significant enthusiasm for the principles and methods of total quality management (TQM) in health care organizations, there have been only a few creative programs applying TQM to medical education. In addition, teaching programs are under significant pressure to teach and practice cost-effective medicine and to produce more sophisticated general internists. In July 1992, the governance and operation of the internal medicine training program at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center was restructured to integrate a TQM program with a health services research section and a resource management department. This restructured program transfers significant programmatic responsibility and power to houseofficers. Within the playing field defined through a housestaff values statement and requirements of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Internal Medicine, the housestaff have brought about substantial change. The first housestaff survey after the new program was operational for six months revealed that 68% of the 77 respondents felt the housestaff had greater programmatic influence, 68% felt that the rate of program change was "better," and 63% felt the overall training program had improved, while 3% felt it had worsened after the restructuring. Fifty-six percent of the housestaff felt the new program should be continued unchanged, and 29% felt it should be continued with changes. Housestaff teams have approached educational issues, quality-of-care problems, and resource management challenges through formal scientific problem-solving techniques. This article discusses the lessons learned in the first six months and the program improvements that will be attempted in the future.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8216645     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199311000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  10 in total

1.  Clinical governance: bridging the gap between managerial and clinical approaches to quality of care.

Authors:  S A Buetow; M Roland
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

2.  Creating a quality improvement elective for medical house officers.

Authors:  Saul N Weingart; Anjala Tess; Jeffrey Driver; Mark D Aronson; Kenneth Sands
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Integrating scholarly activity into residency training.

Authors:  Peter J Carek
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 4.  Adapting residency training. Training adaptable residents.

Authors:  J L Bowen
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-05

5.  Addressing the Scholarly Activity Requirements for Residents: One Program's Solution.

Authors:  Peter J Carek; Lori M Dickerson; Vanessa A Diaz; Terrence E Steyer
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

6.  Pilot study evaluating a practice-based learning and improvement curriculum focusing on the development of system-level quality improvement skills.

Authors:  Anne M Tomolo; Renée H Lawrence; Brook Watts; Sarah Augustine; David C Aron; Mamta K Singh
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-03

7.  Education in quality improvement for practice in primary care during residency training and subsequent activities in practice.

Authors:  Peter J Carek; Lori M Dickerson; Michele Stanek; Charles Carter; Mark T Godenick; Gerard C Jebaily; Stuart Sprague; Elizabeth Baxley
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-03

8.  Teaching and assessing resident competence in practice-based learning and improvement.

Authors:  Greg Ogrinc; Linda A Headrick; Laura J Morrison; Tina Foster
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Teaching and learning methods for new generalist physicians.

Authors:  L Headrick; A Kaufman; P Stillman; L Wilkerson; R Wigton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.