Literature DB >> 8213311

"No-touch" submuscular saline breast augmentation technique.

R A Mladick1.   

Abstract

This article represents a retrospective view of the author's 17-year experience with 2863 saline implants in 1327 patients and details his "no-touch" technique. The experience included almost an equal number of submammary and subpectoral procedures. The submammary procedures were done early on and were replaced with subpectoral procedures, done exclusively at the present time. There were significantly less complications--capsules, wrinkling (visible folds), and deflations--with the subpectoral procedures. Followup is longer for submammary procedures which could be the reason for the slight difference in number of deflations. Analyzing the results from three different periods, during which the technique changed, the last period in which the no-touch subpectoral technique was used had markedly fewer complications. The no-touch technique, which had been introduced in orthopedic surgery over 50 years ago, was added to the augmentation procedure in an attempt to eliminate any possible contact with skin or breast bacteria. There were no infections in the entire series, and, during the no-touch period, capsules were almost eliminated (0.6%). Saline implants can achieve excellent results when placed subpectorally using the no-touch technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8213311     DOI: 10.1007/bf00636260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  13 in total

1.  Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty.

Authors:  D D Dershaw; T A Chaglassian
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Capsular contracture: hard breasts, soft data.

Authors:  B R Burkhardt
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  The biophysical and histologic properties of capsules formed by smooth and textured silicone implants in the rabbit.

Authors:  S Bern; A Burd; J W May
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Partially submuscular breast augmentation.

Authors:  P Regnault
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  A larger subpectoral pocket for breast implants.

Authors:  J M Robles; O A Zimman; J C Lee
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Breast augmentation: a review of subglandular and submuscular implantation.

Authors:  B Vazquez; K S Given; G C Houston
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Augmentation mammaplasty: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  T M Biggs; R S Yarish
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Breast cancer in women after augmentation mammoplasty.

Authors:  M J Silverstein; N Handel; P Gamagami; J R Waisman; E D Gierson; R J Rosser; R Steyskal; W Colburn
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1988-06

9.  Mammography and breast implants.

Authors:  H Hayes; J Vandergrift; W C Diner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Methyl prednisolone in double-lumen gel-saline submuscular mammary prostheses: a double-blind, prospective, controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  S L Spear; H Matsuba; S Romm; J W Little
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  18 in total

1.  [Plastic surgical body form correction. Part II: Face-lift, periorbital surgery, and breast augmentation and reduction].

Authors:  H Ryssel; G Germann; C Heitmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  An illuminating no-touch device for breast augmentation.

Authors:  Michael Sg Bell; Daniel McKee
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Absence of capsular contracture in 319 consecutive augmentation mammaplasties: Dependent drains as a possible factor.

Authors:  Nabil Fanous; Iman Salem; Carolyne Tawilé; Ae Bassas
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

4.  Is Iatrogenic Implant Contamination Preventable Using a 16-Step No-Touch Protocol?

Authors:  Dylan Singh; Ruixue Zhang; Kaitlin H Hori; Fereydoun D Parsa
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2022-08-24

5.  The use of the Alexis(®) device in breast augmentation to improve outcomes: a comparative randomized case-control survey.

Authors:  Luca Andrea Dessy; Nefer Fallico; Francesco Serratore; Diego Ribuffo; Marco Mazzocchi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-06

Review 6.  Revision Breast Augmentation.

Authors:  Brad D Denney; Alvin B Cohn; Jeremy W Bosworth; Pallavi A Kumbla
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Early Results Show Reduced Infection Rate Using No-touch Technique for Expander/ADM Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Henry B Wilson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-04-07

8.  New Deep Dermal ADM Incorporates Well in Case Series of Complex Breast Reconstruction Patients.

Authors:  Henry Benjamin Wilson
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Using Retrorectus Self-adhering Mesh: A Novel Approach.

Authors:  Ibrahim Khansa; Jeffrey E Janis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-11-23

10.  Revisiting Triple Antibiotic Irrigation of Breast Implant Pockets: A Placebo-controlled Single Practice Cohort Study.

Authors:  James J Drinane; Ronald S Bergman; Bryan L Folkers; Matthew J Kortes
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2013-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.