Literature DB >> 17390115

[Plastic surgical body form correction. Part II: Face-lift, periorbital surgery, and breast augmentation and reduction].

H Ryssel1, G Germann, C Heitmann.   

Abstract

The demand for a younger appearance is increasing as the average age of the population increases. Extensive anatomic studies in recent years have improved for facial and breast reconstruction the understanding of anatomic structures and the basis of the aging process. Numerous new surgical techniques have resulted. This understanding of the anatomy of aging and the diversity of surgical methods have made the attainment of naturally young facial appearance more easily possible, in which repositioning of the tissue plays a more important role than lifting. In the past, plastic surgery of the eyelids aimed primarily at hiding the aging process, not at true anatomic restoration. Modern techniques in this field aim more toward redistribution of fatty tissues and the anatomic restoration of aging structures. In this way long-term results are stabilized and secondary stigmata can be avoided. New concepts have also been established in breast surgery that allow more natural results, particularly in augmentation. Although no single method may be designated as superior, there still exists an optimal technique suited to every patient's anatomy and personal wishes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17390115     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1323-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  65 in total

1.  Transconjunctival upper blepharoplasty.

Authors:  P J Weber; A E Wulc; J Foster
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Expanded applications for transconjunctival lower lid blepharoplasty.

Authors:  H A Zarem; J I Resnick
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Vertical mammaplasty: early complications after 250 personal consecutive cases.

Authors:  M Lejour
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Surgical treatment of breast hypertrophy.

Authors:  I Pitanguy
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1967-01

5.  A reduction mammaplasty with the areola-nipple based on an inferior dermal pedicle.

Authors:  T H Robbins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Correction of sunken and/or multiply folded upper eyelid by fascia-fat graft.

Authors:  Y Lee; S Kwon; K Hwang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison.

Authors:  F M Kamer; A S Frankel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Vertical versus Wise pattern breast reduction: patient satisfaction, revision rates, and complications.

Authors:  Norma Cruz-Korchin; Leo Korchin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Augmentation mammaplasty: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  T M Biggs; R S Yarish
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Silicone implants and the inhibition of cancer.

Authors:  C W Su; D A Dreyfuss; T J Krizek; K J Leoni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [Aesthetic breast augmentation].

Authors:  M A Reichenberger; N Biedermann; G Germann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.