Literature DB >> 3630832

Breast augmentation: a review of subglandular and submuscular implantation.

B Vazquez, K S Given, G C Houston.   

Abstract

A study of 156 patients who underwent augmentation mammoplasty at the Medical College of Georgia from June 1980 to July 1985 is presented. Complete records on 89 patients with 196 implants were obtained. A retrospective analysis with respect to capsular contracture was undertaken. Possible influential variables including age of patient, type of prosthesis, operative blood loss, use of local steroids, and site of insertion (i.e., submuscular versus subglandular) were considered. The site of implant insertion was the only statistically significant factor affecting capsular contracture. The incidence of capsular contracture was 9.4% with the submuscular approach and 58.0% with subglandular contracture. The followup time for the submuscular group was 17.4 months (range of 6-36 months) with the mean time of capsule contracture occurring 4.5 months after insertion. There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss or elapsed operating time between the submuscular and the subglandular placements of the prosthesis. This study confirms the submuscular technique of augmentation mammoplasty as the most reliable method of reducing the high incidence of capsular contracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3630832     DOI: 10.1007/BF01575494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  16 in total

1.  Experiences with a large series of silastic breast implants.

Authors:  J E Williams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty. Preliminary report.

Authors:  W C Dempsey; W D Latham
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Concepts and technique in using the new Même prosthesis.

Authors:  M A Shapiro; R Rahall
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Partially submuscular breast augmentation.

Authors:  P Regnault
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  The safety and efficacy of breast implants for augmentation mammaplasty.

Authors:  M H McGrath; B R Burkhardt
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Long-term comparison of patients with gel and saline mammary implants.

Authors:  P McKinney; G Tresley
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Augmentation mammaplasty without contracture.

Authors:  S J Scully
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.539

8.  Late side effects related to inflatable breast prostheses containing soluble steroids.

Authors:  R M Oneal; L C Argenta
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Study of encapsulation of silicone rubber implants in animals. A foreign-body reaction.

Authors:  L M Vistnes; G A Ksander; J Kosek
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Retromammary versus retropectoral breast augmentation-a comparative study.

Authors:  D Mahler; D J Hauben
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.539

View more
  8 in total

1.  Wound infection in breast augmentation: the role of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics.

Authors:  J LeRoy; K S Given
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 2.  [Aesthetic breast augmentation].

Authors:  M A Reichenberger; N Biedermann; G Germann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Immediate reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy.

Authors:  G F Maillard; L J Garey
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.326

4.  "No-touch" submuscular saline breast augmentation technique.

Authors:  R A Mladick
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Comparison of the postoperative incidence rate of capsular contracture among different breast implants: a cumulative meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Liang Zhou; Fuqiang Pan; Yang Gao; Xi Yuan; Dongli Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Transformation of Breast Reconstruction via Additive Biomanufacturing.

Authors:  Mohit P Chhaya; Elizabeth R Balmayor; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Jan-Thorsten Schantz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Current implant surface technology: an examination of their nanostructure and their influence on fibroblast alignment and biocompatibility.

Authors:  S Barr; E Hill; A Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-06-16

8.  The timing of implant exchange in the development of capsular contracture after breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jennifer L Weintraub; David M Kahn
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2008-05-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.