Literature DB >> 8207350

An eight-alternative concurrent schedule: foraging in a radial maze.

T F Elsmore1, S A McBride.   

Abstract

In two experiments conducted in an eight-arm radial maze, food pellets were delivered when a photocell beam was broken at the end of each arm via a nose poke, according to either fixed-interval or random-interval schedules of reinforcement, with each arm providing a different frequency of reinforcement. The behavior of rats exposed to these procedures was well described by the generalized matching law; that is, the relationships between log behavior ratios and log pellet ratios were approximated by linear functions. The slopes of these log-log functions, an index of sensitivity to reinforcement frequency, were greatest for nose pokes, intermediate for time spent in an arm, and least for arm entries. Similar results were obtained with both fixed-interval and random-interval schedules. Addition of a 10-s changeover delay in both experiments eliminated the slope differentials between nose pokes and time spent in an arm by reducing the slopes of the nose-poke functions. These results suggest that different aspects of foraging may be differentially sensitive to reinforcement frequency. With concurrent fixed-interval schedules, the degree of temporal control exerted by individual fixed-interval schedules was directly related to reinforcement frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8207350      PMCID: PMC1334424          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  On some determinants of choice in pigeons.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Matching with a trio of concurrent variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  S S Pliskoff; T G Brown
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Choice, changeover, and travel.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Foraging in a simulated natural environment: There's a rat loose in the lab.

Authors:  R L Mellgren
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Radial arm maze performance of mice: acquisition and atropine effects.

Authors:  A Levy; P B Kluge; T F Elsmore
Journal:  Behav Neural Biol       Date:  1983-11

9.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of scopolamine, pentobarbital, and amphetamine on radial arm maze performance in the rat.

Authors:  D A Eckerman; W A Gordon; J D Edwards; R C MacPhail; M I Gage
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  5 in total

1.  Behaviorism, latent learning, and cognitive maps: needed revisions in introductory psychology textbooks.

Authors:  Robert Jensen
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2006

2.  Barycentric extension of generalized matching.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The applied importance of research on the matching law.

Authors:  W D Pierce; W F Epling
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

4.  Toward a Quantification of Anhedonia: Unified Matching Law and Signal Detection for Clinical Assessment and Drug Development.

Authors:  Oanh T Luc; Diego A Pizzagalli; Brian D Kangas
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-05-19

5.  Human choice among five alternatives when reinforcers decay.

Authors:  Jacob B Rothstein; Greg Jensen; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 1.777

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.