Literature DB >> 20354596

Barycentric extension of generalized matching.

Greg Jensen1, Allen Neuringer.   

Abstract

In most studies of choice under concurrent schedules of reinforcement, two physically identical operanda are provided. In the "real world," however, more than two choice alternatives are often available and biases are common. This paper describes a method for studying choices among an indefinite number of alternatives when large biases are present. Twenty rats were rewarded for choosing among five operanda with reinforcers scheduled probabilistically and concurrently. Large biases were generated by differences among the operanda: two were levers and three were pigeon keys. The results showed that when reinforcer frequencies were systematically varied, an extension of Baum's (1974) Generalized Matching Model, referred to as the Barycentric Matching Model, provided an excellent description of the data, including individual bias values for each of the operanda and a single exponent indicating sensitivity to reinforcer ratios.

Entities:  

Keywords:  barycentric analyses; bias; concurrent schedules of reinforcement; generalized matching; more than two choices; probabilistic reinforcement; rats

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20354596      PMCID: PMC2732327          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Demarcated response sequences and generalised matching.

Authors:  Susan M Schneider; Michael Davison
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference and Switching under Concurrent Scheduling.

Authors:  J D Findley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Response Form, Force, And Number: Effects On Concurrent-schedule Performance.

Authors:  C Sumpter; W Temple; T Foster
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of the discriminability of alternatives in three-alternative concurrent-schedule performance.

Authors:  M Davison; D McCarthy
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Dynamic response-by-response models of matching behavior in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Brian Lau; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  An eight-alternative concurrent schedule: foraging in a radial maze.

Authors:  T F Elsmore; S A McBride
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice as a function of reinforcer "hold": from probability learning to concurrent reinforcement.

Authors:  Greg Jensen; Allen Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2008-10
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Getting It Wrong: Comment on Moore's "Behaviorism and the Stages of Scientific Activity".

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2010
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.