Literature DB >> 2088536

A 2-year quantitative assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis in a sexually transmitted diseases clinic population by the MicroTrak direct smear immunofluorescence test.

B J Thomas1, M F Osborn, P E Munday, R T Evans, D Taylor-Robinson.   

Abstract

The MicroTrak direct smear immunofluorescence test was used to determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis elementary bodies (EBs) in groups of patients in various clinical categories, most of whom were seen in a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases (STD). Overall, 8138 adequate specimens were tested, of which 14.3% were found to contain chlamydial EBs. Of the samples from patients seen in the STD clinic, over 70% were from women and 14.9% of these were positive, as were 15.7% of those from men. EBs were detected in 27% of samples from infants and in 7.0% of those from adults with conjunctivitis. EBs were detected most often in men with nongonococcal urethritis (40.2%), infants with conjunctivitis (30%) and contacts of chlamydiae-positive patients (24.5%) and least often in 'prostatitis' (2.9%) and patients tested to determine the success of treatment (2.7%). Over 40% of samples from both the male urethra and the cervix contained 10 or fewer EBs, highlighting the importance of recognizing small numbers and the sensitivity required of other detection procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2088536     DOI: 10.1177/095646249000100407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  9 in total

1.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson; B J Thomas
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1991-06

3.  Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.

Authors:  P E Hay; B J Thomas; P J Horner; E MacLeod; A M Renton; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-04

4.  Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men.

Authors:  J M Ehret; J C Leszcynski; J M Douglas; S L Genova; M A Chernesky; J Moncada; J Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of a commercial polymerase chain reaction assay for Chlamydia trachomatis and suggestions for improving sensitivity.

Authors:  B J Thomas; E J MacLeod; D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Evaluation of five immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia psittaci in cloacal and conjunctival specimens from turkeys.

Authors:  D Vanrompay; A Van Nerom; R Ducatelle; F Haesebrouck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Expanded gold standard in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in a low prevalence population: diagnostic efficacy of tissue culture, direct immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay, PCR and serology.

Authors:  H Thejls; J Gnarpe; H Gnarpe; P G Larsson; J J Platz-Christensen; L Ostergaard; A Victor
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.