Literature DB >> 8198259

Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery.

A C Perrino1, T O'Connor, M Luther.   

Abstract

The validity of transtracheal Doppler (TTD) cardiac output (CO) monitoring during noncardiac surgery has not been established. A prospective evaluation was undertaken in 30 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery to assess the agreement between TTD and thermodilution measurements of CO. Linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) techniques were employed to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and trending capability of TTD monitoring. A total of 250 simultaneous TTD and thermodilution CO values were compared. TTD and thermodilution CO measurements were highly correlated (P < 0.005, r = 0.84) and Bland-Altman analysis revealed a small systematic underestimation of thermodilution CO (mean bias = -0.25 L/min) with a SD of the bias of 0.88 L/min and a mean percent error of 12.4%. TTD performed particularly well in patients in whom the Doppler signal was stable throughout surgery and required minimal manipulation. In these patients, linear regression yielded the relation TTD CO = 0.96 thermodilution CO + 0.15 with a correlation coefficient r = 0.92. Mean percent error was 10.0% with a mean bias of -0.02 L/min and a SD of the bias of 0.58 L/min. The ability of TTD to track directional changes in thermodilution CO was evaluated by regression analysis and a ROC plot. Changes in TTD CO were highly correlated to changes in thermodilution CO (r = 0.81). ROC plots showed that changes in TTD CO reliably identified large (greater than 15%) changes in thermodilution CO with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 87%. Clinical experience with the TTD device is needed to obtain accurate measurements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8198259     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199406000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  13 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Does using two Doppler cardiac output monitors in tandem provide a reliable trend line of changes for validation studies?

Authors:  Huang Li; Lester A H Critchley; Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Ability of the Masimo pulse CO-Oximeter to detect changes in hemoglobin.

Authors:  Douglas A Colquhoun; Katherine T Forkin; Marcel E Durieux; Robert H Thiele
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  A comparison of the non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) with the oesophageal Doppler monitor during major abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Luke E Hodgson; Lui G Forni; Richard Venn; Theophilus L Samuels; Howard G Wakeling
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-10-14

5.  Semi-continuous versus injectate cardiac output measurement in intensive care patients after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  B W Böttiger; M Soder; H Rauch; H Böhrer; J Motsch; H Bauer; E Martin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Tracking of the beat-to-beat blood pressure changes by the Caretaker physiological monitor against invasive central aortic measurement.

Authors:  Younghoon Kwon; Patrick L Stafford; Martin C Baruch; Sung-Hoon Kim; Yeilim Cho; Sula Mazimba; Lawrence W Gimple
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 7.  Cardiac output monitoring by echocardiography: should we pass on Swan-Ganz catheters?

Authors:  A C Perrino
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct

8.  Comparison of Transpulmonary Thermodilution and Calibrated Pulse Contour Analysis with Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution Cardiac Output Measurements in Anesthetized Dogs.

Authors:  N A Garofalo; F J Teixeira-Neto; J C Rodrigues; S A Cerejo; A J A Aguiar; D R Becerra-Velásquez
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  Accuracy and precision of calibrated arterial pulse contour analysis in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage requiring high-dose vasopressor therapy: a prospective observational clinical trial.

Authors:  Sebastian M Metzelder; Mark Coburn; Christian Stoppe; Michael Fries; Tim-Philipp Simon; Marcus H T Reinges; Anke Höllig; Rolf Rossaint; Gernot Marx; Steffen Rex
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Evaluation of cardiac output by 5 arterial pulse contour techniques using trend interchangeability method.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Fischer; Momar Diouf; Robert B P de Wilde; Hervé Dupont; Jean-Luc Hanouz; Emmanuel Lorne
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.