Literature DB >> 8197555

Breast reconstruction in older women.

D A August1, E Wilkins, T Rea.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than 50% of breast cancer care in the United States occurs in women over age 65 years. This study investigates age-related differences in breast reconstruction practices after mastectomy for breast cancer.
METHODS: Retrospective review of University of Michigan Breast Care Center patients revealed 242 female patients with breast cancer who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction from 1980 through 1991. Data were complied concerning patient age, reconstruction interval (immediate or delayed), type of breast reconstruction performed, reconstruction-associated complications, and the number of postreconstruction procedures required to obtain the final result. Statistical comparisons were made with the chi-squared test.
RESULTS: There were 224 patients aged less than 60 years (range 27 to 59 years; median, 44 years) and 18 patients aged 60 years or more (oldest, 68 years). Of the 18 older patients, three underwent delayed transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) reconstruction; one received a delayed latissimus dorsi flap placed over a silicone gel prosthesis, and 14 underwent 18 reconstructions (4 bilateral) with silicone gel implants (6 immediate, 12 delayed). The younger patients underwent 269 breast reconstructions (45 bilateral), including 92 autogenous tissue reconstructions (34 immediate TRAM, 58 delayed TRAM), 60 immediate and 88 delayed insertions of an expander or prosthesis, and 29 latissimus dorsi flaps with implant reconstructions (3 immediate, 26 delayed). Seven complications (32%) occurred in the 22 breast reconstructions performed in older women, including capsular contracture surrounding an implant (six patients) and a ventral hernia in one patient with a TRAM flap. Complications occurred in 134 breast reconstructions (50%) performed in younger women. All were related to the reconstruction. In the older women a mean of 1.7 +/- 0.7 operations was required to achieve a final reconstruction result versus 2.1 +/- 1.1 in the younger women (not significant). More operations were required in younger women undergoing prosthetic reconstruction than in older women, but this difference was not statistically significant (2.4 +/- 1.2 versus 1.9 +/- 0.7; p = 0.07). Autogenous tissue reconstruction was performed less frequently in older women (14% versus 34%; p < 0.05). No age-related difference was noted in the rate of immediate (versus delayed) reconstruction (27% versus 36%, respectively). Complications occurred more frequently in women who underwent prosthetic breast reconstruction, particularly in younger women (32% in older women and 64% in younger women; p < 0.01). The complication rate for immediate breast reconstruction in older women (all prosthetic) was less than in younger women (17% versus 59%; p < 0.05). For delayed prosthetic reconstructions, complications also occurred less frequently in older than younger women (38% versus 67%; p < 0.05). Between 1988 and 1992, 91 older women and 180 younger women underwent mastectomy for breast cancer; only 7% of older women versus 38% of younger women underwent breast reconstruction (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction is a safe option for older women requiring mastectomy. The full array of reconstruction options (autogenous tissue or implants, immediate or delayed) should be considered for use in women of all ages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8197555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  15 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennica Platt; Nancy Baxter; Toni Zhong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Choices in surgery for older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Vikram Swaminathan; Markos K Spiliopoulos; Riccardo A Audisio
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Effect of Patient Age on Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Results from a Multicenter Prospective Study.

Authors:  Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Breast reconstructive surgery in medically underserved women with breast cancer: the role of patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Yihang Liu; Elaine Kwong; Amardeep Thind; Allison L Diamant
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Single dual-trained surgeon for breast care leads to higher reconstruction rates after mastectomy.

Authors:  Ashkaun Shaterian; Salim C Saba; Brittany Yee; Christopher Tokin; Brian Mailey; Marek K Dobke; Anne M Wallace
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Persistent Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction and Strategies for Mitigation.

Authors:  Paris D Butler; Martin P Morris; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Variation in the utilization of reconstruction following mastectomy in elderly women.

Authors:  Haejin In; Wei Jiang; Stuart R Lipsitz; Bridget A Neville; Jane C Weeks; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 8.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

9.  Tendency to breast reconstruction after breast mastectomy among Iranian women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Fatemeh Homaei Shandiz; Mona Najaf Najafi; Zahra Abbasi Shaye; Mahta Salehi; Maryam Salehi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-06-29

10.  Nipple sparing mastectomy and direct to implant breast reconstruction, validation of the safe procedure through the use of laser assisted indocyanine green fluorescent angiography.

Authors:  Roy de Vita; Ernesto Maria Buccheri
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.