BACKGROUND: Breast reconstructive surgery can improve mastectomy patients' emotional relationships and social functioning, but it may be underutilized in low-income, medically underserved women. This study assessed the impact of patient-physician communication on rates of breast reconstructive surgery in low-income breast cancer (BC) women receiving mastectomy. METHODS: A cross-sectional, California statewide survey was conducted of women with income less than 200% of the Federal Poverty Level and receiving BC treatment through the Medicaid Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program. A subset of 327 women with nonmetastatic disease who underwent mastectomy was identified. Logistic regression was used for data analysis. The chief dependent variable was receipt of or planned breast reconstructive surgery by patient report at 6 months after diagnosis; chief independent variables were physician interactive information giving and patient perceived self-efficacy in interacting with physicians. RESULTS: Greater physician information giving about BC and its treatment and greater patient perceived self-efficacy positively predicted breast reconstructive surgery (OR=1.12, P=.04; OR=1.03, P=.01, respectively). The observed negative effects of language barriers and less acculturation among Latinas and lower education at the bivariate level were mitigated in multivariate modeling with the addition of the patient-physician communication and self-efficacy variables. CONCLUSIONS: Empowering aspects of patient-physician communication and self-efficacy may overcome the negative effects of language barriers and less acculturation for Latinas, as well as of lower education generally, on receipt of or planned breast reconstructive surgery among low-income women with BC. Intervening with these aspects of communication could result in breast reconstructive surgery rates more consistent with the general population and in improved quality of life among this disadvantaged group. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: Breast reconstructive surgery can improve mastectomy patients' emotional relationships and social functioning, but it may be underutilized in low-income, medically underserved women. This study assessed the impact of patient-physician communication on rates of breast reconstructive surgery in low-income breast cancer (BC) women receiving mastectomy. METHODS: A cross-sectional, California statewide survey was conducted of women with income less than 200% of the Federal Poverty Level and receiving BC treatment through the Medicaid Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program. A subset of 327 women with nonmetastatic disease who underwent mastectomy was identified. Logistic regression was used for data analysis. The chief dependent variable was receipt of or planned breast reconstructive surgery by patient report at 6 months after diagnosis; chief independent variables were physician interactive information giving and patient perceived self-efficacy in interacting with physicians. RESULTS: Greater physician information giving about BC and its treatment and greater patient perceived self-efficacy positively predicted breast reconstructive surgery (OR=1.12, P=.04; OR=1.03, P=.01, respectively). The observed negative effects of language barriers and less acculturation among Latinas and lower education at the bivariate level were mitigated in multivariate modeling with the addition of the patient-physician communication and self-efficacy variables. CONCLUSIONS: Empowering aspects of patient-physician communication and self-efficacy may overcome the negative effects of language barriers and less acculturation for Latinas, as well as of lower education generally, on receipt of or planned breast reconstructive surgery among low-income women with BC. Intervening with these aspects of communication could result in breast reconstructive surgery rates more consistent with the general population and in improved quality of life among this disadvantaged group. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: M Noguchi; W Fukushima; N Ohta; N Koyasaki; M Thomas; I Miyazaki; T Yamada; M Nakagawa Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 1992-08 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: P Ananian; G Houvenaeghel; C Protière; P Rouanet; S Arnaud; J P Moatti; A Tallet; A C Braud; C Julian-Reynier Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2004-07-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jennifer F Tseng; Steven J Kronowitz; Charlotte C Sun; Allison C Perry; Kelly K Hunt; Gildy V Babiera; Lisa A Newman; S Eva Singletary; Nadeem Q Mirza; Frederick C Ames; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Merrick I Ross; Barry W Feig; Geoffrey L Robb; Henry M Kuerer Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Patricia A Ganz; Lorna Kwan; Annette L Stanton; Janice L Krupnick; Julia H Rowland; Beth E Meyerowitz; Julienne E Bower; Thomas R Belin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Rose C Maly; Barbara Leake; Cynthia M Mojica; Yihang Liu; Allison L Diamant; Amardeep Thind Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Catherine A Marshall; Linda K Larkey; Melissa A Curran; Karen L Weihs; Terry A Badger; Julie Armin; Francisco García Journal: Fam Syst Health Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.950
Authors: Celia Patricia Kaplan; Leah S Karliner; E Shelley Hwang; Joan Bloom; Susan Stewart; Dana Nickleach; Jessica Quinn; Angela Thrasher; Anna Maria Nápoles Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Yihang Liu; Jennifer L Malin; Allison L Diamant; Amardeep Thind; Rose C Maly Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-12-23 Impact factor: 4.872