Literature DB >> 8194302

When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases.

L Gerken1, P W Jusczyk, D R Mandel.   

Abstract

According to prosodic bootstrapping accounts of syntax acquisition, language learners use the correlation between syntactic boundaries and prosodic changes (e.g., pausing, vowel lengthening, large increases or decreases in fundamental frequency) to cue the presence and arrangement of syntactic constituents. However, recent linguistic accounts suggest that prosody does not directly reflect syntactic structure but rather is governed by independent prosodic units such as phonological phrases. To examine the implications of this view for the prosodic bootstrapping hypothesis, infants in Experiment 1 were presented with sentences in which pauses were inserted either between the subject noun phrase (NP) and verb or after the verb. Half of the infants heard sentences with lexical NP subjects, in which prosodic structure is consistent with syntactic structure. The other half heard sentences with pronoun subjects, in which prosodic structure does not mirror syntactic structure. In a preferential listening paradigm, infants in the lexical NP condition listened longer to materials containing pauses between the subject and verb, the main syntactic constituents. However, in the pronoun NP condition, infants showed no difference in listening times for the two pause locations. To determine if other sentence types containing pronoun subjects potentially provide information about the syntactic constituency of these elements, infants in Experiment 2 heard yes-no questions with pronoun subjects, in which the prosodic structure reflects the constituency of the subject. Infants listened longer when pauses were inserted between the subject and verb than after the verb. Taken together, our results suggest that the prosodic information in an individual sentence is not always sufficient to assign a syntactic structure. Rather, learners must engage in active inferential processes, using cross-sentence comparisons and other types of information to arrive at the correct syntactic representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8194302     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90055-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  11 in total

1.  Prosody's role in language acquisition and adult parsing.

Authors:  L Gerken
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

Review 2.  A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing.

Authors:  S Shattuck-Hufnagel; A E Turk
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

3.  Toddlers default to canonical surface-to-meaning mapping when learning verbs.

Authors:  Isabelle Dautriche; Alejandrina Cristia; Perrine Brusini; Sylvia Yuan; Cynthia Fisher; Anne Christophe
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-09-30

4.  More is less: pitch discrimination and language delays in children with optimal outcomes from autism.

Authors:  Inge-Marie Eigsti; Deborah A Fein
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 5.216

5.  Functional MRI of language lateralization during development in children.

Authors:  Scott K Holland; Jennifer Vannest; Marc Mecoli; Lisa M Jacola; Jan-Mendelt Tillema; Prasanna R Karunanayaka; Vincent J Schmithorst; Weihong Yuan; Elena Plante; Anna W Byars
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Contributions of infant word learning to language development.

Authors:  Daniel Swingley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing.

Authors:  Youngon Choi; Reiko Mazuka
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-03

8.  The role of linguistic experience in the development of the consonant bias.

Authors:  Amritha Mallikarjun; Emily Shroads; Rochelle S Newman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Prosodic processing by children: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Elena Plante; Scott K Holland; Vince J Schmithorst
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Reading Prosody as a Dimension of Oral Reading Fluency in Early Elementary School Children.

Authors:  Justin Miller; Paula J Schwanenflugel
Journal:  Read Res Q       Date:  2008-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.