Literature DB >> 33052544

The role of linguistic experience in the development of the consonant bias.

Amritha Mallikarjun1, Emily Shroads2, Rochelle S Newman2.   

Abstract

Consonants and vowels play different roles in speech perception: listeners rely more heavily on consonant information rather than vowel information when distinguishing between words. This reliance on consonants for word identification is the consonant bias Nespor et al. (Ling 2:203-230, 2003). Several factors modulate infants' development of the consonant bias, including fine-grained temporal processing ability and native language exposure [for review, see Nazzi et al. (Curr Direct Psychol Sci 25:291-296, 2016)]. A rat model demonstrated that mature fine-grained temporal processing alone cannot account for consonant bias emergence; linguistic exposure is also necessary Bouchon and Toro (An Cog 22:839-850, 2019). This study tested domestic dogs, who have similarly fine-grained temporal processing but more language exposure than rats, to assess whether a minimal lexicon and small degree of regular linguistic exposure can allow for consonant bias development. Dogs demonstrated a vowel bias rather than a consonant bias, preferring their own name over a vowel-mispronounced version of their name, but not in comparison to a consonant-mispronounced version. This is the pattern seen in young infants Bouchon et al. (Dev Sci 18:587-598, 2015) and rats Bouchon et al. (An Cog 22:839-850, 2019). In a follow-up study, dogs treated a consonant-mispronounced version of their name similarly to their actual name, further suggesting that dogs do not treat consonant differences as meaningful for word identity. These results support the findings from Bouchon and Toro (An Cog 2:839-850, 2019), suggesting that there may be a default preference for vowel information over consonant information when identifying word forms, and that the consonant bias may be a human-exclusive tool for language learning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canine cognition; Consonant bias; Dogs; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33052544     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01436-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  26 in total

1.  What's new, pussycat? On talking to babies and animals.

Authors:  Denis Burnham; Christine Kitamura; Ute Vollmer-Conna
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Linguistic constraints on statistical computations: the role of consonants and vowels in continuous speech processing.

Authors:  Luca L Bonatti; Marcela Peña; Marina Nespor; Jacques Mehler
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-06

3.  Is the consonant bias specifically human? Long-Evans rats encode vowels better than consonants in words.

Authors:  Camillia Bouchon; Juan M Toro
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  English-learning one- to two-year-olds do not show a consonant bias in word learning.

Authors:  Caroline Floccia; Thierry Nazzi; Claire Delle Luche; Silvana Poltrock; Jeremy Goslin
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2013-07-19

5.  Voice-sensitive regions in the dog and human brain are revealed by comparative fMRI.

Authors:  Attila Andics; Márta Gácsi; Tamás Faragó; Anna Kis; Adám Miklósi
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Call me Alix, not Elix: vowels are more important than consonants in own-name recognition at 5 months.

Authors:  Camillia Bouchon; Caroline Floccia; Thibaut Fux; Martine Adda-Decker; Thierry Nazzi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-10-07

7.  Phonological specificity in children at 1;2.

Authors:  Kate D Ballem; Kim Plunkett
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2005-02

8.  Neural mechanisms for lexical processing in dogs.

Authors:  A Andics; A Gábor; M Gácsi; T Faragó; D Szabó; Á Miklósi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  When prosody fails to cue syntactic structure: 9-month-olds' sensitivity to phonological versus syntactic phrases.

Authors:  L Gerken; P W Jusczyk; D R Mandel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-03

10.  The domestication of social cognition in dogs.

Authors:  Brian Hare; Michelle Brown; Christina Williamson; Michael Tomasello
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Language preference in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris).

Authors:  Amritha Mallikarjun; Emily Shroads; Rochelle S Newman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 2.899

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.