Literature DB >> 8187698

Nonlinearity of dose-response functions for carcinogenicity.

D G Hoel1, C J Portier.   

Abstract

Carcinogenesis data for 315 chemicals were obtained from the National Cancer Institute-National Toxicology Program (NCI-NTP) bioassay programs and were analyzed to examine the shape of carcinogenesis dose-response curves. Tumor site data were more often consistent with a quadratic response than with a linear response, suggesting that the routine use of linear dose-response models will often overestimate risk. Information from in vivo short-term mutagenicity and genotoxicity assays was also obtained for most of these rodent bioassays. It was found that there were no clear relationships between the shape of the carcinogenesis dose-response curve and the result of the short-term test. These observations argue against the concept that carcinogens that are positive in a short-term assay be regulated using a linear dose-response curve and those that are negative be regulated using a sublinear dose-response curve or a safety factor approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8187698      PMCID: PMC1566901          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102s1109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  26 in total

1.  Estimating "safe" levels, a hazardous undertaking.

Authors:  N Mantel; M A Schneiderman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  The genotoxic/epigenetic distinction: relevance to cancer policy.

Authors:  F P Perera
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 3.  Cellular oncogenes and multistep carcinogenesis.

Authors:  H Land; L F Parada; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Carcinogen testing: current problems and new approaches.

Authors:  J H Weisburger; G M Williams
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Fibroblast immortality is a prerequisite for transformation by EJ c-Ha-ras oncogene.

Authors:  R F Newbold; R W Overell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Aug 18-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Implication of nonlinear kinetics on risk estimation in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  D G Hoel; N L Kaplan; M W Anderson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Contribution of toxicology towards risk assessment of carcinogens.

Authors:  R Kroes
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; A G Knudson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Studies on the mechanism of skin tumor promotion: evidence for several stages in promotion.

Authors:  T J Slaga; S M Fischer; K Nelson; G L Gleason
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Approach to risk assessment for genotoxic carcinogens based on data from the mouse skin initiation-promotion model.

Authors:  F Burns; R Albert; B Altshuler; E Morris
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  On use of the multistage dose-response model for assessing laboratory animal carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Daniela K Nitcheva; Walter W Piegorsch; R Webster West
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 2.  Evaluation of health risks for contaminated aquifers.

Authors:  W T Piver; T L Jacobs; M A Medina
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Application of the U.S. EPA mode of action Framework for purposes of guiding future research: a case study involving the oral carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Laurie C Haws; Mark A Harris; Nicole M Gatto; Deborah M Proctor
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity.

Authors:  Wade V Welshons; Kristina A Thayer; Barbara M Judy; Julia A Taylor; Edward M Curran; Frederick S vom Saal
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Topics in cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  S S Olin; D A Neumann; J A Foran; G J Scarano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.

Authors:  J McCann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Risk assessment of thyroid follicular cell tumors.

Authors:  R N Hill; T M Crisp; P M Hurley; S L Rosenthal; D V Singh
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.