Literature DB >> 6823565

Implication of nonlinear kinetics on risk estimation in carcinogenesis.

D G Hoel, N L Kaplan, M W Anderson.   

Abstract

Efforts in estimating carcinogenic risk in humans from long-term exposure to chemical carcinogens have centered on the problem of low-dose extrapolation. For chemicals with metabolites that interact with DNA, it may be more meaningful to relate tumor response to the concentration of the DNA adducts in the target organ rather than to the applied dose. Many data suggest that the relation between tumor response and concentration of DNA adducts in the target organ may be linear. This implies that the nonlinearities of the dose-response curve for tumor induction may be due to the kinetic processes involved in the formation of carcinogen metabolite--DNA adducts. Of particular importance is the possibility that the kinetic processes may show a nonlinear "hockey-stick" like behavior which results from saturation of detoxification or DNA repair processes. The mathematical models typically used for low-dose extrapolation are shown potentially to overestimate risk by several orders of magnitude when nonlinear kinetics are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6823565     DOI: 10.1126/science.6823565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  23 in total

1.  Employing a Mechanistic Model for the MAPK Pathway to Examine the Impact of Cellular all or None Behavior on Overall Tissue Response.

Authors:  Nicholas S Luke; Michael J Devito; Christopher J Portier; Hisham A El-Masri
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 2.  Overdose toxicity studies versus threshold: elements of biology must be incorporated into risk assessment.

Authors:  A G Hildebrandt
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Air samples versus biomarkers for epidemiology.

Authors:  Y S Lin; L L Kupper; S M Rappaport
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Effect of ten thiocompounds on rat liver DNA damage induced by a small dose of N-nitrosodimethylamine.

Authors:  G Brambilla; P Carlo; R Finollo
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Low-dose radiation and genotoxic chemicals can protect against stochastic biological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Vernon E Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

Review 6.  Opportunities for improving techniques for interspecies extrapolation in the risk assessment process.

Authors:  J E Gibson; T B Starr
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Implications of pharmacokinetic modeling in risk assessment analysis.

Authors:  R J Lutz; R L Dedrick
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Topics in cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  S S Olin; D A Neumann; J A Foran; G J Scarano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Absorption and distribution of xenobiotics.

Authors:  F G Standaert
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.