Literature DB >> 8185041

Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion.

R E Khoo1, M M Cohen, G M Chapman, D A Jenken, J M Langevin.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the morbidity of creating and closing loop ileostomies in a consecutive series of patients having an ileoanal pouch procedure. Between 1983 and 1991, 203 patients had loop ileostomies created for temporary fecal diversion after an ileoanal pouch procedure. There was one death as a result of liver failure. One patient developed a persistent pouch-vaginal fistula that resulted in pouch excision. The remaining 201 patients had their ileostomies closed at a mean time of 10 weeks after the primary procedure. Only 7% needed surgery to correct ileostomy-related problems. After ileostomy closure, complications were noted in only 2% of patients. Loop ileostomy is easy to create and provides highly effective fecal diversion, which decreases the incidence of and mitigates the serious sequelae of pouch sepsis. Closure is simple, does not require a laparotomy, and is associated with few complications. Our experience with loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion after an ileoanal pouch procedure has been favorable. The loop ileostomy may be the stoma of choice for most clinical situations in which temporary fecal diversion is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8185041     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(94)90249-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  20 in total

1.  Renal impairment caused by temporary loop ileostomy.

Authors:  Nicole Beck-Kaltenbach; Katja Voigt; Bernhard Rumstadt
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases.

Authors:  Andre Chow; Henry S Tilney; Paraskevas Paraskeva; Santhini Jeyarajah; Emmanouil Zacharakis; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Morbidity related to defunctioning loop ileostomy in low anterior resection.

Authors:  Oscar Åkesson; Ingvar Syk; Gudrun Lindmark; Pamela Buchwald
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Postoperative complications after closure of a diverting ileostoma--differences according to closure technique.

Authors:  Kajsa Gustavsson; Ulf Gunnarsson; Pia Jestin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rudolf Mennigen; Wiebke Sewald; Norbert Senninger; Emile Rijcken
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Closure of loop ileostomy: potentially a daycase procedure?

Authors:  O Peacock; C I Law; P W Collins; W J Speake; J N Lund; G M Tierney
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Andrew Kennedy-Dalby; Sheik Rehman; Reza Arsalani Zadeh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; C Jensen; A S Phair; O T Kelly; S B Kelly
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Purse-string approximation is superior to primary skin closure following stoma reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  D P McCartan; J P Burke; S R Walsh; J C Coffey
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.