Literature DB >> 8182320

Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech.

F Debruyne1, P Delaere, J Wouters, P Uwents.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate the vocal quality of tracheo-oesophageal and oesophageal speech, several objective acoustic parameters were measured in the acoustic waveform (fundamental frequency, waveform perturbation) and in the frequency spectrum (harmonic prominence, spectral slope). Twelve patients using tracheo-oesophageal speech (with the Provox valve) and 12 patients using oesophageal speech for at least two months, participated. The main results were that tracheo-oesophageal voices more often showed a detectable fundamental frequency, and that this fundamental frequency was fairly stable; there was also a tendency to more clearly defined harmonics in tracheo-oesophageal speech. This suggests a more regular vibratory pattern in the pharyngo-oesophageal segment, due to the more efficient respiratory drive in tracheo-oesophageal speech. So, a better quality of the voice can be expected, in addition to the longer phonation time and higher maximal intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8182320     DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100126660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  13 in total

1.  Application of the Voice Handicap Index in 45 patients with substitution voicing after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Mieke Moerman; Jean-Pierre Martens; Philippe Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal voice in male total laryngectomy patients.

Authors:  N Deore; S Datta; R C Dwivedi; R Palav; R Shah; S I Sayed; M Jagde; R Kazi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Intelligibility of laryngectomees' substitute speech: automatic speech recognition and subjective rating.

Authors:  Maria Schuster; Tino Haderlein; Elmar Nöth; Jörg Lohscheller; Ulrich Eysholdt; Frank Rosanowski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Perceptual evaluation of substitution voices: development and evaluation of the (I)INFVo rating scale.

Authors:  M B J Moerman; J P Martens; M J Van der Borgt; M Peleman; M Gillis; P H Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Intensity and fundamental frequency control in tracheoesophageal voice.

Authors:  A Schindler; A Canale; A L Cavalot; R Albera; P Capaccio; F Ottaviani; O Schindler
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Outcomes and adverse events of enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy.

Authors:  Katherine A Hutcheson; Jan S Lewin; Erich M Sturgis; Jan Risser
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  [Prosthetic voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Failures and complications after previous radiation therapy].

Authors:  P Kummer; M Chahoud; M Schuster; U Eysholdt; F Rosanowski
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Social withdrawal after laryngectomy.

Authors:  Helge Danker; Dorit Wollbrück; Susanne Singer; Michael Fuchs; Elmar Brähler; Alexandra Meyer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Objective evaluation of the quality of substitution voices.

Authors:  Mieke Moerman; Glenn Pieters; Jean-Pierre Martens; Marie-Jeanne Van der Borgt; Phillippe Dejonckere
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Objective and perceptual analysis of outcome of voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy in an Indian tertiary referral cancer centre.

Authors:  B T Varghese; A Mathew; S Sebastian; E M Iype; P Sebastian; B Rajan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-03-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.