Literature DB >> 22004634

Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal voice in male total laryngectomy patients.

N Deore1, S Datta, R C Dwivedi, R Palav, R Shah, S I Sayed, M Jagde, R Kazi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that voice parameters of post-laryngectomy patients using tracheo-oesophageal (TO) prosthetic valves are similar to those of normal laryngeal subjects.
METHODS: Thirty total laryngectomy patients and thirty normal controls were subjected to acoustic analysis of single voice recordings using a sustained vowel. Acoustic parameters including fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio and maximum phonation time were analysed.
RESULTS: Poorer values were found as well as larger variability for all the voice parameters for the total laryngectomy patients using TO voice compared with those of normal subjects. There were statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for all studied parameters between the TO and normal speech.
CONCLUSIONS: Alaryngeal speech with TO voice prosthesis is not yet comparable to laryngeal speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22004634      PMCID: PMC3604921          DOI: 10.1308/147870811X13137608454975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  14 in total

1.  Prognostic factors for survival in patients with T3 laryngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  J J Manni; C H Terhaard; M F de Boer; G A Croll; F J Hilgers; A A Annyas; A G van der Meij; G J Hordijk
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Current status and future prospects in prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy.

Authors:  Prashant V Pawar; Suhail I Sayed; Rehan Kazi; Mohan V Jagade
Journal:  J Cancer Res Ther       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.805

3.  First applications of a new laryngograph.

Authors:  A J Fourcin; E Abberton
Journal:  Med Biol Illus       Date:  1971-07

4.  Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech.

Authors:  F Debruyne; P Delaere; J Wouters; P Uwents
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.469

5.  Fundamental frequency and intensity measurements in laryngeal and alaryngeal speakers.

Authors:  G W Blood
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 2.288

6.  An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy.

Authors:  M I Singer; E D Blom
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Acoustic characteristics: tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  T W Baggs; S J Pine
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Acceptability ratings of tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  R H Pindzola; B H Cain
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Failures after irradiation in early vocal cord cancer.

Authors:  A Bosch; M T Kademian; Z C Frias; W L Caldwell
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Acoustic differentiation of laryngeal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech.

Authors:  J Robbins
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-12
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaske E van Sluis; Lisette van der Molen; Rob J J H van Son; Frans J M Hilgers; Patrick A Bhairosing; Michiel W M van den Brekel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The relationship between biomechanics of pharyngoesophageal segment and tracheoesophageal phonation.

Authors:  Teng Zhang; Ian Cook; Michał Szczęśniak; Julia Maclean; Peter Wu; Duong Duy Nguyen; Catherine Madill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.