Literature DB >> 20563299

Ecological Inference in the Social Sciences.

Adam Glynn1, Jon Wakefield.   

Abstract

Ecological inference is a problem of partial identification, and therefore reliable precise conclusions are rarely possible without the collection of individual level (identifying) data. Without such data, sensitivity analyses provide the only recourse. In this paper we review and critique approaches to ecological inference in the social sciences, and describe in detail hierarchical models, which allow both sensitivity analysis and the incorporation of individual level data into an ecological analysis. A crucial element of a sensitivity analysis in such models is prior specification, and we detail how this may be carried out. Furthermore, we demonstrate how the inclusion of a small amount of individual level data can dramatically improve the properties of such estimates.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20563299      PMCID: PMC2885825          DOI: 10.1016/j.stamet.2009.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methodol        ISSN: 1572-3127


  9 in total

1.  Biases in ecological studies: utility of including within-area distribution of confounders.

Authors:  V Lasserre; C Guihenneuc-Jouyaux; S Richardson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Hierarchical models for multicentre binary response studies.

Authors:  A M Skene; J C Wakefield
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Ecologic studies revisited.

Authors:  Jonathan Wakefield
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Multi-level modelling, the ecologic fallacy, and hybrid study designs.

Authors:  Jon Wakefield
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  Commentary: Individual, ecological and multilevel fallacies.

Authors:  J Michael Oakes
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  Commentary: 'Is the social world flat? W.S. Robinson and the ecologic fallacy'.

Authors:  Glenn Firebaugh
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Revisiting Robinson: the perils of individualistic and ecologic fallacy.

Authors:  S V Subramanian; Kelvyn Jones; Afamia Kaddour; Nancy Krieger
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Comparison of relative risks obtained in ecological and individual studies: some methodological considerations.

Authors:  S Richardson; I Stücker; D Hémon
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 9.  Invited commentary: ecologic studies--biases, misconceptions, and counterexamples.

Authors:  S Greenland; J Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Assessing uncertainty of voter transitions estimated from aggregated data. Application to the 2017 French presidential election.

Authors:  Rafael Romero; Jose M Pavía; Jorge Martín; Gerardo Romero
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 1.416

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.