Literature DB >> 8177168

Lessons from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S rRNA structures from a comparative perspective.

R R Gutell1, N Larsen, C R Woese.   

Abstract

The 16S and 23S rRNA higher-order structures inferred from comparative analysis are now quite refined. The models presented here differ from their immediate predecessors only in minor detail. Thus, it is safe to assert that all of the standard secondary-structure elements in (prokaryotic) rRNAs have been identified, with approximately 90% of the individual base pairs in each molecule having independent comparative support, and that at least some of the tertiary interactions have been revealed. It is interesting to compare the rRNAs in this respect with tRNA, whose higher-order structure is known in detail from its crystal structure (36) (Table 2). It can be seen that rRNAs have as great a fraction of their sequence in established secondary-structure elements as does tRNA. However, the fact that the former show a much lower fraction of identified tertiary interactions and a greater fraction of unpaired nucleotides than the latter implies that many of the rRNA tertiary interactions remain to be located. (Alternatively, the ribosome might involve protein-rRNA rather than intramolecular rRNA interactions to stabilize three-dimensional structure.) Experimental studies on rRNA are consistent to a first approximation with the structures proposed here, confirming the basic assumption of comparative analysis, i.e., that bases whose compositions strictly covary are physically interacting. In the exhaustive study of Moazed et al. (45) on protection of the bases in the small-subunit rRNA against chemical modification, the vast majority of bases inferred to pair by covariation are found to be protected from chemical modification, both in isolated small-subunit rRNA and in the 30S subunit. The majority of the tertiary interactions are reflected in the chemical protection data as well (45). On the other hand, many of the bases not shown as paired in Fig. 1 are accessible to chemical attack (45). However, in this case a sizeable fraction of them are also protected against chemical modification (in the isolated rRNA), which suggests that considerable higher-order structure remains to be found (although all of it may not involve base-base interactions and so may not be detectable by comparative analysis). The agreement between the higher-order structure of the small-subunit rRNA and protection against chemical modification is not perfect, however; some bases shown to covary canonically are accessible to chemical modification (45).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Exobiology; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8177168      PMCID: PMC372950          DOI: 10.1128/mr.58.1.10-26.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Rev        ISSN: 0146-0749


  62 in total

1.  Secondary structure model for bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA: phylogenetic, enzymatic and chemical evidence.

Authors:  C R Woese; L J Magrum; R Gupta; R B Siegel; D A Stahl; J Kop; N Crawford; J Brosius; R Gutell; J J Hogan; H F Noller
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-05-24       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Detailed analysis of the higher-order structure of 16S-like ribosomal ribonucleic acids.

Authors:  C R Woese; R Gutell; R Gupta; H F Noller
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1983-12

3.  Halobacterium volcanii tRNAs. Identification of 41 tRNAs covering all amino acids, and the sequences of 33 class I tRNAs.

Authors:  R Gupta
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1984-08-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Secondary structure model for 23S ribosomal RNA.

Authors:  H F Noller; J Kop; V Wheaton; J Brosius; R R Gutell; A M Kopylov; F Dohme; W Herr; D A Stahl; R Gupta; C R Waese
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Gene organization and primary structure of a ribosomal RNA operon from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Brosius; T J Dull; D D Sleeter; H F Noller
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-05-15       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Secondary structure comparisons between small subunit ribosomal RNA molecules from six different species.

Authors:  C Zwieb; C Glotz; R Brimacombe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-08-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Primary and secondary structures of Escherichia coli MRE 600 23S ribosomal RNA. Comparison with models of secondary structure for maize chloroplast 23S rRNA and for large portions of mouse and human 16S mitochondrial rRNAs.

Authors:  C Branlant; A Krol; M A Machatt; J Pouyet; J P Ebel; K Edwards; H Kössel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-09-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  A general secondary-structure model for procaryotic and eucaryotic RNAs from the small ribosomal subunits.

Authors:  P Stiegler; P Carbon; J P Ebel; C Ehresmann
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1981-12

9.  The phylogenetically conserved doublet tertiary interaction in domain III of the large subunit rRNA is crucial for ribosomal protein binding.

Authors:  E A Kooi; C A Rutgers; A Mulder; J Van't Riet; J Venema; H A Raué
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Localisation of a series of intra-RNA cross-links in the secondary and tertiary structure of 23S RNA, induced by ultraviolet irradiation of Escherichia coli 50S ribosomal subunits.

Authors:  W Stiege; C Glotz; R Brimacombe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-03-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  220 in total

1.  Negative in vitro selection identifies the rRNA recognition motif for ErmE methyltransferase.

Authors:  A K Nielsen; S Douthwaite; B Vester
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 2.  Macrolide resistance conferred by base substitutions in 23S rRNA.

Authors:  B Vester; S Douthwaite
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A phylogenomic study of DNA repair genes, proteins, and processes.

Authors:  J A Eisen; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Prediction of common secondary structures of RNAs: a genetic algorithm approach.

Authors:  J H Chen; S Y Le; J V Maizel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  A phylogenetic analysis reveals an unusual sequence conservation within introns involved in RNA editing.

Authors:  P J Aruscavage; B L Bass
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Intraspecific diversity of the 23S rRNA gene and the spacer region downstream in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A I Antón; A J Martínez-Murcia; F Rodríguez-Valera
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Comparative analysis of more than 3000 sequences reveals the existence of two pseudoknots in area V4 of eukaryotic small subunit ribosomal RNA.

Authors:  J Wuyts; P De Rijk; Y Van de Peer; G Pison; P Rousseeuw; R De Wachter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Mapping of the RNA recognition site of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S7.

Authors:  F Robert; M Gagnon; D Sans; S Michnick; L Brakier-Gingras
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.942

9.  Cross-talk between orientation-dependent recognition determinants of a complex control RNA element, the enterovirus oriR.

Authors:  W J Melchers; J M Bakkers; H J Bruins Slot; J M Galama; V I Agol; E V Pilipenko
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 10.  Translation: in retrospect and prospect.

Authors:  C R Woese
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.