Literature DB >> 10445878

Negative in vitro selection identifies the rRNA recognition motif for ErmE methyltransferase.

A K Nielsen1, S Douthwaite, B Vester.   

Abstract

Erm methyltransferases modify bacterial 23S ribosomal RNA at adenosine 2058 (A2058, Escherichia coli numbering) conferring resistance to macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLS) antibiotics. The motif that is recognized by Erm methyltransferases is contained within helix 73 of 23S rRNA and the adjacent single-stranded region around A2058. An RNA transcript of 72 nt that displays this motif functions as an efficient substrate for the ErmE methyltransferase. Pools of degenerate RNAs were formed by doping 34-nt positions that extend over and beyond the putative Erm recognition motif within the 72-mer RNA. The RNAs were passed through a series of rounds of methylation with ErmE. After each round, RNAs were selected that had partially or completely lost their ability to be methylated. After several rounds of methylation/selection, 187 subclones were analyzed. Forty-three of the subclones contained substitutions at single sites, and these are confined to 12 nucleotide positions. These nucleotides, corresponding to A2051-A2060, C2611, and A2614 in 23S rRNA, presumably comprise the RNA recognition motif for ErmE methyltransferase. The structure formed by these nucleotides is highly conserved throughout bacterial rRNAs, and is proposed to constitute the motif that is recognized by all the Erm methyltransferases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10445878      PMCID: PMC1369827          DOI: 10.1017/s1355838299990349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  25 in total

1.  High-affinity RNA ligands to Escherichia coli ribosomes and ribosomal protein S1: comparison of natural and unnatural binding sites.

Authors:  S Ringquist; T Jones; E E Snyder; T Gibson; I Boni; L Gold
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-03-21       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  ErmE methyltransferase recognizes features of the primary and secondary structure in a motif within domain V of 23 S rRNA.

Authors:  I D Villsen; B Vester; S Douthwaite
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-02-19       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The conformation of 23S rRNA nucleotide A2058 determines its recognition by the ErmE methyltransferase.

Authors:  B Vester; L H Hansen; S Douthwaite
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 4.  Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification.

Authors:  B Weisblum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vitro evolution of a self-alkylating ribozyme.

Authors:  C Wilson; J W Szostak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Cleavage of an amide bond by a ribozyme.

Authors:  X Dai; A De Mesmaeker; G F Joyce
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-01-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A compilation of large subunit (23S and 23S-like) ribosomal RNA structures: 1993.

Authors:  R R Gutell; M W Gray; M N Schnare
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Domain V of 23S rRNA contains all the structural elements necessary for recognition by the ErmE methyltransferase.

Authors:  B Vester; S Douthwaite
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  23S rRNA domain V, a fragment that can be specifically methylated in vitro by the ErmSF (TlrA) methyltransferase.

Authors:  D Kovalic; R B Giannattasio; H J Jin; B Weisblum
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Substrate requirements for ErmC' methyltransferase activity.

Authors:  P Zhong; S D Pratt; R P Edalji; K A Walter; T F Holzman; A G Shivakumar; L Katz
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  3 in total

1.  Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the predicted rRNA-binding domain of ErmC' redefines the substrate-binding site and suggests a model for protein-RNA interactions.

Authors:  Gordana Maravić; Janusz M Bujnicki; Marcin Feder; Sándor Pongor; Mirna Flögel
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Molecular dynamics simulations suggest why the A2058G mutation in 23S RNA results in bacterial resistance against clindamycin.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kulczycka-Mierzejewska; Joanna Sadlej; Joanna Trylska
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Impact of ribosomal modification on the binding of the antibiotic telithromycin using a combined grand canonical monte carlo/molecular dynamics simulation approach.

Authors:  Meagan C Small; Pedro Lopes; Rodrigo B Andrade; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.