Literature DB >> 21303011

Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.

Lisa D Sanders1, Benjamin H Zobel, Richard L Freyman, Rachel Keen.   

Abstract

To gain information from complex auditory scenes, it is necessary to determine which of the many loudness, pitch, and timbre changes originate from a single source. Grouping sound into sources based on spatial information is complicated by reverberant energy bouncing off multiple surfaces and reaching the ears from directions other than the source's location. The ability to localize sounds despite these echoes has been explored with the precedence effect: Identical sounds presented from two locations with a short stimulus onset asynchrony (e.g., 1-5 ms) are perceived as a single source with a location dominated by the lead sound. Importantly, echo thresholds, the shortest onset asynchrony at which a listener reports hearing the lag sound as a separate source about half of the time, can be manipulated by presenting sound pairs in contexts. Event-related brain potentials elicited by physically identical sounds in contexts that resulted in listeners reporting either one or two sources were compared. Sound pairs perceived as two sources elicited a larger anterior negativity 100-250 ms after onset, previously termed the object-related negativity, and a larger posterior positivity 250-500 ms. These results indicate that the models of room acoustics listeners form based on recent experience with the spatiotemporal properties of sound modulate perceptual as well as later higher-level processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21303011      PMCID: PMC3055288          DOI: 10.1121/1.3514518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  43 in total

1.  Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  C Alain; S R Arnott; T W Picton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Neural activity associated with binaural processes for the perceptual segregation of pitch.

Authors:  Blake W Johnson; Michael Hautus; Wes C Clapp
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  The mismatch negativity (MMN): towards the optimal paradigm.

Authors:  Risto Näätänen; Satu Pakarinen; Teemu Rinne; Rika Takegata
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Midlatency auditory evoked responses: differential recovery cycle characteristics.

Authors:  R J Erwin; J S Buchwald
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-11

5.  The recovery functions of auditory event-related potentials during split-second discriminations.

Authors:  D L Woods; E Courchesne
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-07

6.  Recovery cycle of the acoustically evoked potential.

Authors:  J C Bess; H B Ruhm
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1972-09

7.  Historical background of the Haas and-or precedence effect.

Authors:  M B Gardner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neural activity associated with distinguishing concurrent auditory objects.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Benjamin M Schuler; Kelly L McDonald
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Representation of concurrent acoustic objects in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effects of attentional load on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Aaron Izenberg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  8 in total

1.  Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Attention is critical for spatial auditory object formation.

Authors:  Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

4.  The precedence effect: fusion and lateralization measures for headphone stimuli lateralized by interaural time and level differences.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The effects of preceding lead-alone and lag-alone click trains on the buildup of echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Deepak Yadav; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The precedence effect and its buildup and breakdown in ferrets and humans.

Authors:  Sandra Tolnai; Ruth Y Litovsky; Andrew J King
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spatial attention modulates the precedence effect.

Authors:  Sam London; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Local inhibition of GABA affects precedence effect in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Yanjun Wang; Ningyu Wang; Dan Wang; Jun Jia; Jinfeng Liu; Yan Xie; Xiaohui Wen; Xiaoting Li
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 5.135

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.