Literature DB >> 8172652

Carcinogen risk assessment in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

R E Albert1.   

Abstract

This is a narrative account of the origins and development of carcinogen risk assessment in the U.S. EPA, which pioneered the field. It began in an era of high hopes that the regulation of carcinogens in the environment would make a major reduction in the heavy public health burden of cancer. The immediate cause for the development of carcinogen risk assessment was the need to respond to heavy criticism that the EPA was not using science in an unbiased way to defend its regulation of important pesticides as carcinogens. The formulation of the initial assessment guidelines is described as well as the rationale behind the assessment procedures that were developed by the EPA's Carcinogen Assessment Group. The issue of whether the original hopes of reducing cancer has been realized is discussed. Recent developments in molecular carcinogenesis point to the possibility of a revised view of the role of environmental carcinogens at low levels of exposure from that of causing cancer de novo to an acceleration of the development of cancer that results from heritable genetic defects. It is suggested that advances in carcinogen risk assessment will mainly depend on a better understanding of the causes and mechanisms of cancer in humans at the molecular level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8172652     DOI: 10.3109/10408449409017920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  9 in total

Review 1.  Linear low-dose extrapolation for noncancer heath effects is the exception, not the rule.

Authors:  Lorenz R Rhomberg; Julie E Goodman; Lynne T Haber; Michael Dourson; Melvin E Andersen; James E Klaunig; Bette Meek; Paul S Price; Roger O McClellan; Samuel M Cohen
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Mechanistic Models Fit to ED001 Data on >40,000 Trout Exposed to Dibenzo[A,L]pyrene Indicate Mutations Do Not Drive Increased Tumor Risk.

Authors:  Kenneth T Bogen
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 3.  Use of mechanistic data in assessing human risks from exposure to particles.

Authors:  R O McClellan
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Mechanism of skin tumorigenesis by contact sensitizers: the effect of the corticosteroid fluocinolone acetonide on inflammation and tumor induction by 2,4 dinitro-1-fluorobenzene in the skin of the TG.AC (v-Ha-ras) mouse.

Authors:  R E Albert; J E French; R Maronpot; J Spalding; R Tennant
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Using exposure bands for rapid decision making in the RISK21 tiered exposure assessment.

Authors:  M Dellarco; R Zaleski; B J Gaborek; H Qian; C A Bellin; P Egeghy; N Heard; O Jolliet; D R Lander; N Sunger; K S Stylianou; J Y Tanir
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Null Hypothesis Testing ≠ Scientific Inference: A Critique of the Shaky Premise at the Heart of the Science and Values Debate, and a Defense of Value-Neutral Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Brian H MacGillivray
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Chemical characteristics and cancer risk assessment of smokeless tobacco used in Tunisia (neffa).

Authors:  Fatma Guezguez; Mohamed Abdelwaheb; Ichraf Anane; Saleheddine Rekik; Saad Saguem; Bassem Charfeddine; Sonia Rouatbi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-09-17

8.  Environmental occurrence and risk assessment of haloacetic acids in swimming pool water and drinking water.

Authors:  Huihui Zhao; Linyan Yang; Yejin Li; Weibo Xue; Kai Li; Yingqi Xie; Shujuan Meng; Guomin Cao
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 9.  Cancer risk assessment of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: a critical review of methodology.

Authors:  J McCann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.