Literature DB >> 9400751

Use of mechanistic data in assessing human risks from exposure to particles.

R O McClellan1.   

Abstract

The ultimate goal of toxicologic investigations of both natural and man-made fibrous and nonfibrous particles is to provide essential input for the assessment of potential human risks from exposure to these materials. The development of risk assessment procedures for airborne particles has evolved over the years. The earliest assessments for naturally occurring materials used direct human observations and incorporated safety factors to arrive at allowable human exposures. More recently, there has been a need to assess the potential risk associated with production and use of certain man-made materials for which human data are not available or are inadequate. For these materials, it has been necessary to assess human risks using data obtained from studies conducted in laboratory animals and with cells or tissues. During the last several decades, it has been suggested that data on the mechanisms by which particles cause disease could be used to reduce the uncertainty in estimates of human risks of particle exposures. This article provides comments on the use of mechanistic data in the risk assessment process and suggestions for increasing the successful development and use of mechanistic data in risk assessments conducted in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9400751      PMCID: PMC1470139          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.97105s51363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  8 in total

1.  THE ENVIRONMENT AND DISEASE: ASSOCIATION OR CAUSATION?

Authors:  A B HILL
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1965-05

2.  Carcinogen risk assessment in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Authors:  R E Albert
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 3.  Reducing uncertainty in risk assessment by using specific knowledge to replace default options.

Authors:  R O McClellan
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  1996 Feb-May       Impact factor: 4.518

Review 4.  Significance of particle parameters in the evaluation of exposure-dose-response relationships of inhaled particles.

Authors:  G Oberdorster
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Comparative pulmonary toxicities and carcinogenicities of chronically inhaled diesel exhaust and carbon black in F344 rats.

Authors:  K J Nikula; M B Snipes; E B Barr; W C Griffith; R F Henderson; J L Mauderly
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1995-04

Review 6.  A strategy for establishing mode of action of chemical carcinogens as a guide for approaches to risk assessments.

Authors:  B E Butterworth; R B Conolly; K T Morgan
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  1995-06-29       Impact factor: 8.679

7.  Pulmonary inflammatory, chemokine, and mutagenic responses in rats after subchronic inhalation of carbon black.

Authors:  K E Driscoll; J M Carter; B W Howard; D G Hassenbein; W Pepelko; R B Baggs; G Oberdörster
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 8.  Role of biopersistence in the pathogenicity of man-made fibers and methods for evaluating biopersistence: a summary of two round-table discussions.

Authors:  R O McClellan; T W Hesterberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Dispersion of Natural Airborne TiO2 Fibres in Excavation Activity as a Potential Environmental and Human Health Risk.

Authors:  Sebastiano La Maestra; Francesco D'Agostini; Elisa Sanguineti; Adrián Yus González; Samanta Annis; Gaia M Militello; Giovanni Parisi; Alberto Scuderi; Laura Gaggero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.