Literature DB >> 8166669

Architectural variations of inducible eukaryotic promoters: preset and remodeling chromatin structures.

L L Wallrath1, Q Lu, H Granok, S C Elgin.   

Abstract

The DNA in a eukaryotic nucleus is packaged into a nucleosome array, punctuated by variations in the regular pattern. The local chromatin structure of inducible genes appears to fall into two categories: preset and remodeling. Preset genes are those in which the binding sites for trans-acting factors are accessible (i.e. in a non-nucleosomal, DNase I hypersensitive configuration) prior to activation. In response to the activation signal, positive factors bind to cis-acting regulatory elements and trigger transcription with no major alterations in the chromatin structure of the promoter region. In contrast, remodeling genes are those in which some of the required cis-acting regulatory elements are packaged into nucleosomes. The nucleosomes must be perturbed in response to an activation signal in order for the trans-acting factors to gain access to cis-acting elements; a chromatin remodeling process which forms DNase I hypersensitive sites must occur. In both cases, precise positioning of nucleosomes along the promoter region of a gene appears to be critical for appropriate regulation of expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8166669     DOI: 10.1002/bies.950160306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  68 in total

1.  Acetylation of a specific promoter nucleosome accompanies activation of the epsilon-globin gene by beta-globin locus control region HS2.

Authors:  C Y Gui; A Dean
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  The GATA factor AreA is essential for chromatin remodelling in a eukaryotic bidirectional promoter.

Authors:  M I Muro-Pastor; R Gonzalez; J Strauss; F Narendja; C Scazzocchio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  A comparison of in vivo and in vitro DNA-binding specificities suggests a new model for homeoprotein DNA binding in Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  A Carr; M D Biggin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  The role of MOF in the ionizing radiation response is conserved in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Manika P Bhadra; Nobuo Horikoshi; Sreerangam N C V L Pushpavallipvalli; Arpita Sarkar; Indira Bag; Anita Krishnan; John C Lucchesi; Rakesh Kumar; Qin Yang; Raj K Pandita; Mayank Singh; Utpal Bhadra; Joel C Eissenberg; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  Nucleosome sliding: facts and fiction.

Authors:  Peter B Becker
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 6.  Epigenetic regulation of pancreas development and function.

Authors:  Dana Avrahami; Klaus H Kaestner
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 7.  The genetics of type 2 diabetes: what have we learned from GWAS?

Authors:  Liana K Billings; Jose C Florez
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 8.  Epigenetics of reprogramming to induced pluripotency.

Authors:  Bernadett Papp; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  A developmentally modulated chromatin structure at the mouse immunoglobulin kappa 3' enhancer.

Authors:  M C Roque; P A Smith; V C Blasquez
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  Telomeres, histone code, and DNA damage response.

Authors:  S Misri; S Pandita; R Kumar; T K Pandita
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.636

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.