Literature DB >> 8165491

Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intensity and localization of pain and analysis of predictors in preoperative symptoms and intraoperative events.

B M Ure1, H Troidl, W Spangenberger, A Dietrich, R Lefering, E Neugebauer.   

Abstract

It is postulated that laparoscopic cholecystectomy as "patient-friendly surgery" leads to more comfort and in particular to less pain. A prospective study on pain was performed on all patients undergoing the operation over the period of 1 year (n = 382) out of a series of more than 1,000 patients who have undergone the operation in our clinic. Pain was measured by a 100-point visual analogue scale (VAS), by a five-point verbal rating scale, and by the consumption of analgesics. Pain was the most frequent symptom, both before and after the operation. The mean level of pain was 37 VAS points 5 h after the operation and declined to 16 points on the third day. In 106 patients (27.8%) the intensity of pain was higher than 50 VAS points. Analgesics were used by 282 patients (73.8%), opioids by 112 (29.3%). Pain was significantly higher in female than male patients (P < 0.05), but consumption of analgesics was similar in both groups. The most severe pain was localized to the abdominal wall wounds by 157 (41.1%) and to the right upper abdomen by 138 patients (36.1%) on the first postoperative day. Patients who needed opioids and/or had a pain level of > 50 VAS points (n = 138) had higher preoperative pain levels (P = 0.018) and preoperatively complained more frequently about nausea, vomiting, bloating, and a feeling of abdominal pressure (P = 0.003-0.031). However, predictive values of these variables were too small to be of clinical benefit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8165491     DOI: 10.1007/bf00316616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  31 in total

1.  Interruption of professional and home activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy among French and American patients.

Authors:  G C Vitale; D Collet; G M Larson; W G Cheadle; F B Miller; J Perissat
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Conventional versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the randomized controlled trial. Cholecystectomy Study Group.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; W Spangenberger; A Dietrich; R Lefering
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Grace; A Quereshi; J Coleman; R Keane; G McEntee; P Broe; H Osborne; D Bouchier-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Postoperative pain: a comparison of laparoscopic sterilisation and diagnostic laparoscopy.

Authors:  A Davis; J M Millar
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Postoperative pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy with different types of anesthesia.

Authors:  M Tverskoy; C Cozacov; M Ayache; E L Bradley; I Kissin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Evaluation of symptoms and signs of gallstone disease in patients admitted with upper abdominal pain.

Authors:  C Wegge; J Kjaergaard
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Subcostal incision versus midline laparotomy in gallstone surgery: a prospective and randomized trial.

Authors:  J C García-Valdecasas; R Almenara; C Cabrer; A M de Lacy; M Sust; P Taurá; J Fuster; L Grande; M Pera; J Sentis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J H Peters; G D Gibbons; J T Innes; K E Nichols; M E Front; S R Roby; E C Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Effect of intraperitoneal local anesthetic on pain characteristics after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Geun Joo Choi; Hyun Kang; Chong Wha Baek; Yong Hun Jung; Dong Rim Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Placement of 0.5% bupivacaine-soaked Surgicel in the gallbladder bed is effective for pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G R Verma; T S Lyngdoh; L Kaman; I Bala
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Racial Disparities in Receipt of Postoperative Opioids After Pediatric Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Amy E Lawrence; Katherine J Deans; Deena J Chisolm; Sharon K Wrona; Peter C Minneci; Jennifer N Cooper
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Combination of etoricoxib and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum versus standard treatment for the management of pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wasana Ko-Iam; Sahataya Paiboonworachat; Paisal Pongchairerks; Sunhawit Junrungsee; Trichak Sandhu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  A systematic review of interventions to facilitate ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yeri Ahn; Jennifer Woods; Saxon Connor
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Acute phase is the only significantly reduced component of the injury response after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E M Targarona; M J Pons; C Balagué; J J Espert; A Moral; J Martínez; J Gaya; X Filella; F Rivera; A Ballesta; M Trías
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum versus standard pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Trichak Sandhu; Sirikan Yamada; Veeravorn Ariyakachon; Thiraphat Chakrabandhu; Wilaiwan Chongruksut; Wasana Ko-iam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  J R Eriksen; P Poornoroozy; L N Jørgensen; B Jacobsen; H U Friis-Andersen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Risk assessment in cholelithiasis: is cholecystectomy always to be preferred?

Authors:  Marlies C Mertens; Jan A Roukema; Vincent P W Scholtes; Jolanda De Vries
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.