Literature DB >> 8661626

Acute phase is the only significantly reduced component of the injury response after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

E M Targarona1, M J Pons, C Balagué, J J Espert, A Moral, J Martínez, J Gaya, X Filella, F Rivera, A Ballesta, M Trías.   

Abstract

The objective demonstration of improved postoperative recovery suggests that the surgical injury response induced by the laparoscopic approach is less intensive than that after open surgery. Twenty-five patients diagnosed as having noncomplicated gallstones were studied prospectively. They were operated by laparoscopy (group I, n = 12) or open surgery (group II, n = 13). Analgesia requirements (p < 0.026) and postoperative stay (p < 0.001) were significantly less in group 1. Cholecystectomy performed by either technical options induced a significant increase over basal values of glucose, lactate, white blood cell count, prolactin, ACTH, cortisol, interleukin 6, C-reactive protein, and PCO2. Both surgical procedures induced a significant reduction of total proteins, albumin, prealbumin, free fatty acids hemoglobin, hematocrit, and pH. There were no differences between the levels of growth hormone, insulin, glucagon, or PO2 during any of the periods studied. Comparison of the results of the two cholecystectomy techniques showed that laparoscopic cholecystectomy induced a significantly less intensive acute-phase response (area under the curve) of interleukin 6 (17 +/- 17 versus 47 +/- 26 pg/ml x hr x 10(2); p < 0.003), C-reactive protein (16 +/- 12 versus 35 +/-16 mg/dl x hr x 10; p < 0.004), and prealbumin (16 +/- 2.7 versus 13.8 +/- 2.3 mg/dl x hr x 10(2); p < 0.05). The surgical injury response after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is similar to that after open cholecystectomy, but the aeute-phase response component is less intense. This finding may be a consequence of the reduced size of the operative wound with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8661626     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  31 in total

Review 1.  Metabolic response to sepsis and trauma.

Authors:  R G Douglas; J H Shaw
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  [Stress reaction and anesthesia. The role of morphine agonists and antagonists].

Authors:  R Simionescu
Journal:  Cah Anesthesiol       Date:  1988 Jun-Jul

3.  A standardized human model of moderate trauma. Quantitative studies of glucose turnover during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L Jorfeldt
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand Suppl       Date:  1985

4.  Comparison of metabolic responses to laparoscopic and minilaparotomy cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A J McMahon; P J O'Dwyer; A M Cruikshank; D C McMillan; D S O'Reilly; G D Lowe; A Rumley; R W Logan; J N Baxter
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 5.  The major acute phase reactants: C-reactive protein, serum amyloid P component and serum amyloid A protein.

Authors:  D M Steel; A S Whitehead
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1994-02

6.  Interleukin-6 and coagulation-fibrinolysis fluctuations after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G Vander Velpen; F Penninckx; R Kerremans; J Van Damme; J Arnout
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Effect of anesthesia and surgery on plasma cytokine levels.

Authors:  M Shimada; R A Winchurch; S Beloucif; J L Robotham
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.425

8.  Metabolic and inflammatory responses after open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M S Jakeways; V Mitchell; I A Hashim; S J Chadwick; A Shenkin; C J Green; F Carli
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Production of interleukin-6 at operative wound sites in surgical patients.

Authors:  H Ueo; H Inoue; M Honda; I Uchida; M Nishimura; S Arinaga; H Nakashima; T Akiyoshi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial.

Authors:  A J McMahon; I T Russell; J N Baxter; S Ross; J R Anderson; C G Morran; G Sunderland; D Galloway; G Ramsay; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  9 in total

1.  Early immune outcome of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yang Lu; Fan Tianyong; Wei Qiang; Cui Xiaobo; Bu Siyuan; Han Ping
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  The increased incidence of intraabdominal infections in laparoscopic procedures: potential causes, postoperative management, and prospective innovations.

Authors:  A K Strickland; R G Martindale
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Operative stress response is reduced after laparoscopic compared to open cholecystectomy: the relationship with postoperative pain and ileus.

Authors:  I Le Blanc-Louvry; A Coquerel; E Koning; C Maillot; P Ducrotté
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Immediate peritoneal response to bacterial contamination during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E M Targarona; M Rodríguez; M Camacho; C Balagué; I Gich; L Vila; M Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A randomized pilot study on single-port versus conventional laparoscopic rectal surgery: effects on postoperative pain and the stress response to surgery.

Authors:  O Bulut; K K Aslak; K Levic; C B Nielsen; E Rømer; S Sørensen; I J Christensen; H J Nielsen
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Differences in stress response between patients undergoing transurethral resection versus endoscopic laser ablation of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Goran Bedalov; Zeljko Bartolin; Damir Puskar; Ivan Savić; Ivana Bedalov; Marija Rudolf; Drago Batinić
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  A A F A Veenhof; C Sietses; B M E von Blomberg; I M W van Hoogstraten; M H G M vd Pas; W J H J Meijerink; D L vd Peet; M P vd Tol; H J Bonjer; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Association Between the Use of a Mobile Health Strategy App and Biological Changes in Breast Cancer Survivors: Prospective Pre-Post Study.

Authors:  Mario Lozano-Lozano; Lucia Melguizo-Rodríguez; Carolina Fernández-Lao; Noelia Galiano-Castillo; Irene Cantarero-Villanueva; Lydia Martín-Martín; Manuel Arroyo-Morales
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Systemic inflammatory response after natural orifice translumenal surgery: transvaginal cholecystectomy in a porcine model.

Authors:  Joe K M Fan; Daniel K H Tong; David W Y Ho; John Luk; Wai Lun Law; Simon Law
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.