Literature DB >> 8158224

Topographic patterns of responsiveness to odorants in the rat olfactory epithelium.

A Mackay-Sim1, S Kesteven.   

Abstract

1. Regional differences in odorant-induced responsiveness of the rat olfactory epithelium were measured via electrophysiological recordings [negative component of electro-olfactogram (Veog(-)) made from the surface of the olfactory epithelium on the nasal septum]. The nasal septum provided a flat surface from which multiple recordings could be made. 2. Veog(-)s were recorded from a standardized grid of 16 sites. This grid of recording sites extended over most of the surface of the olfactory epithelium on the nasal septum. 3. Twenty-one animals were tested for their responses to seven odorants. The animals were divided into three groups, each of which was tested with two different odorants plus amyl acetate, which provided a comparison between the groups. 4. For each odorant in each animal, topographic maps of relative responsiveness were derived to test whether odorants elicited different patterns of responses in the same individual. Topographic maps of responsiveness were derived also for the animal groups to test for the generality of the form of the maps for different odorants. Response latencies were also measured for each odorant at each recording site. 5. All individuals showed different topographic patterns of responses to the three test odorants. For most odorants, the location of the most responsive site was similar in all animals. In different animals the topographic maps for the same odorant were remarkably similar. Topographic maps for the odorants were all different from one another. 6. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that odorant quality is encoded in the differential spatial distribution of receptor cells whose differences in responsiveness appear to be distributed as a continuum across the epithelium. The results establish for a mammalian species what was previously reported in amphibians. These differences are presumed to be due to differential expression of odorant receptor proteins. 7. The mean response latency was 32 ms. This period was similar for all odorants, all animals, and all recording sites and was independent of Veog(-) amplitude. It is concluded that diffusion through the mucus contributed approximately 6 ms to the latency of onset of the responses to these odorants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8158224     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.1.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  18 in total

1.  Chemical determinants of the rat electro-olfactogram.

Authors:  J W Scott; T Brierley; F H Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons.

Authors:  M Ma; G M Shepherd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Molecular organization of the olfactory septal organ.

Authors:  Huikai Tian; Minghong Ma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neural activity at the human olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception.

Authors:  Hadas Lapid; Sagit Shushan; Anton Plotkin; Hillary Voet; Yehudah Roth; Thomas Hummel; Elad Schneidman; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Effects of concentration and sniff flow rate on the rat electroolfactogram.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 7.  Molecular genetics of mammalian olfaction.

Authors:  H Breer; I Wanner; J Strotmann
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Nested expression domains for odorant receptors in zebrafish olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  F Weth; W Nadler; S Korsching
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Intrinsic chemosensory signal recorded from the human nasal mucosa in patients with smell loss.

Authors:  Tadashi Ishimaru; Franziska Krone; Mandy Scheibe; Volker Gudziol; Simona Negoias; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Tests of the sorption and olfactory "fovea" hypotheses in the mouse.

Authors:  David M Coppola; Brittaney E Ritchie; Brent A Craven
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.