Literature DB >> 23053385

Intrinsic chemosensory signal recorded from the human nasal mucosa in patients with smell loss.

Tadashi Ishimaru1, Franziska Krone, Mandy Scheibe, Volker Gudziol, Simona Negoias, Thomas Hummel.   

Abstract

Physiological investigation of olfactory receptor function in hyposmic or anosmic patients is rare. Pioneers examined the electro-olfactogram in patients with olfactory disturbance. Although the electro-olfactogram is an established method to record olfactory responses from human olfactory epithelium, the response is only measured at specific sites of the olfactory mucosa. In contrast to that the response of the olfactory epithelium to chemosensory stimuli can be studied in a specific nasal area by means of intrinsic optical signal recording. Five functionally anosmic patients were included in the present study. In all patients, responses could be obtained following trigeminal stimulation with CO2. In some patients, responses could be obtained after olfactory stimulation with H2S and PEA. The present data show that in the studied patients trigeminal function seems to be preserved, while it appears that in some patients olfactory function is preserved to a certain degree.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23053385     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2203-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

Review 1.  Role of nerve growth factor in the olfactory system.

Authors:  Takaki Miwa; Tetsuji Moriizumi; Isao Horikawa; Naoki Uramoto; Tadashi Ishimaru; Toshiro Nishimura; Mitsuru Furukawa
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 2.769

2.  The recording of odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns with a voltage-sensitive dye.

Authors:  P F Kent; M M Mozell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Topographic patterns of responsiveness to odorants in the rat olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  A Mackay-Sim; S Kesteven
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Intranasal trigeminal stimulation from odorous volatiles: psychometric responses from anosmic and normal humans.

Authors:  R L Doty; W E Brugger; P C Jurs; M A Orndorff; P J Snyder; L D Lowry
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1978-02

5.  Anterior distribution of human olfactory epithelium.

Authors:  D A Leopold; T Hummel; J E Schwob; S C Hong; M Knecht; G Kobal
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Topographical differences in the sensitivity of the human nasal mucosa to olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.

Authors:  Tadashi Ishimaru; Jens Reden; Franziska Krone; Mandy Scheibe
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds.

Authors:  G Kobal; L Klimek; M Wolfensberger; H Gudziol; A Temmel; C M Owen; H Seeber; E Pauli; T Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Olfactory mucosa of patients with olfactory disturbance following head trauma.

Authors:  M Yamagishi; R Okazoe; Y Ishizuka
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  Significance of intravenous olfaction test using thiamine propyldisulfide (Alinamin) in olfactometry.

Authors:  M Furukawa; M Kamide; T Miwa; R Umeda
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.863

10.  Peripherally obtained electrophysiological responses to olfactory stimulation in man: electro-olfactograms exhibit a smaller degree of desensitization compared with subjective intensity estimates.

Authors:  T Hummel; M Knecht; G Kobal
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1996-04-22       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.