Literature DB >> 8156271

Breaking bad news: realistic versus unrealistic hopes.

M Links1, J Kramer.   

Abstract

Hope is an essential aspect of the therapeutic relationship between cancer patients and their carers. Realistic hopes provide considerable support, whereas unrealistic hopes can be destructive by impairing the ability to make appropriate decisions about future plans, treatment, and issues of personal importance. Realistic hopes exist for cancer patients at all stages of their illness. Provision of realistic hope facilities the process of breaking bad news. In this article, the role of hope is explored. Appropriate hopes are identified from the time of pre-diagnostic work-up throughout the phase of definitive treatment and into the transition to palliative and supportive care. A practical approach is developed, which emphasises communication and listening skills, the importance of providing time and the benefits of intermediate goals that facilitate a gradual adjustment in hopes as the disease progresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156271     DOI: 10.1007/bf00572089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  10 in total

1.  Three ways of giving bad news.

Authors:  T B Brewin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Self-identified needs of patients with cancer at home and their home caregivers: a descriptive study.

Authors:  J W Hileman; N R Lackey
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Goals of palliative cancer therapy.

Authors:  F Porzsolt; I Tannock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The cancer patient: communication and morale.

Authors:  T B Brewin
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977 Dec 24-31

5.  Communicate with cancer patients: 1. Handling bad news and difficult questions.

Authors:  P Maguire; A Faulkner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08

6.  Quality of life in cancer care.

Authors:  C L Olweny
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

Authors:  K C Calman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Breaking bad news.

Authors:  R C Charlton
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1992-11-02       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  [Dealing with cancer--conversations with radiotherapy patients].

Authors:  F Popp; R Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 10.  Anxiety and cancer: the patient and the family.

Authors:  J C Holland
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.384

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Controversies in supportive care: destructive or beneficial diversity?

Authors:  E Bruera
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Decision making in palliative radiation therapy: reframing hope in caregivers and patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Jacqueline Sze; Stephen Marisette; Diane Williams; Joyce Nyhof-Young; Dauna Crooks; Amna Husain; Andrea Bezjak; Rebecca K S Wong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Patients' anxiety and hope: predictors and adherence intentions in an acute care context.

Authors:  Angela M Legg; Sara E Andrews; Ho Huynh; Arezou Ghane; Arnold Tabuenca; Kate Sweeny
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Hope, quality of life, and benefit from treatment in women having chemotherapy for platinum-resistant/refractory recurrent ovarian cancer: the gynecologic cancer intergroup symptom benefit study.

Authors:  Katrin M Sjoquist; Michael L Friedlander; Rachel L O'Connell; Merryn Voysey; Madeleine T King; Martin R Stockler; Amit M Oza; Kim Gillies; Julie K Martyn; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-10-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.