Literature DB >> 24107972

Hope, quality of life, and benefit from treatment in women having chemotherapy for platinum-resistant/refractory recurrent ovarian cancer: the gynecologic cancer intergroup symptom benefit study.

Katrin M Sjoquist1, Michael L Friedlander, Rachel L O'Connell, Merryn Voysey, Madeleine T King, Martin R Stockler, Amit M Oza, Kim Gillies, Julie K Martyn, Phyllis N Butow.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy for platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer is motivated by the hope of benefit. We sought to determine the relationships between: (a) trait hope, expectation of symptom benefit from chemotherapy, and anxiety and depression; (b) hope and perceived efficacy of chemotherapy; and (c) unfulfilled hope (where expectations for benefit are not fulfilled) and depression. Methods. Adult patients enrolled within stage 1 of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Symptom Benefit Study were included. Patient. Reported outcomes were collected from 126 women with predominantly platinum-resistant ovarian cancer at baseline, prior to the first four treatment cycles (12-16 weeks), and four weeks after completing chemotherapy or at disease progression, whichever came first. Associations were assessed with Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r) and odds ratio. Results. Trait hope and expectation of symptom benefit from chemotherapy were weakly correlated with each other (r = 0.25). Trait hope, but not expectation of symptom benefit, was negatively correlated with anxiety (r = -0.43) and depression (r = -0.50). The smaller the discrepancy between perceived and expected symptom benefit, the less likely the patient was to have scores indicative of depression (odds ratio: 0.68; 95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.96; p = .026). Conclusion. Trait hope and expectation of symptom benefit from chemotherapy appear to be distinct and independent of the aspects of quality of life and scores for depression. Hope did not appear to affect perceived efficacy of chemotherapy in alleviating symptoms, but women whose expectation of symptom benefit from chemotherapy was not fulfilled were more likely to have scores indicative of depression. It may be preferable to encourage hope toward achievable goals rather than toward benefits from chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Hope; Recurrent ovarian cancer; Symptom benefit; Symptoms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24107972      PMCID: PMC3825308          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  44 in total

1.  Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  K Herth
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  "Ethical hope"--a lifeline for sick patients.

Authors:  D Grandinetti
Journal:  Med Econ       Date:  1999-08-09

3.  A comparison of the level of hope in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent cancer.

Authors:  A Ballard; T Green; A McCaa; M C Logsdon
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Use of CA 125 in follow-up of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  G Rustin; M Tuxen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  P Peduzzi; J Concato; E Kemper; T R Holford; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Breaking bad news: realistic versus unrealistic hopes.

Authors:  M Links; J Kramer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Relationship between cancer patients' predictions of prognosis and their treatment preferences.

Authors:  J C Weeks; E F Cook; S J O'Day; L M Peterson; N Wenger; D Reding; F E Harrell; P Kussin; N V Dawson; A F Connors; J Lynn; R S Phillips
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Symposium on compassionate care and the dying experience. Hope: its spheres and dimensions.

Authors:  K Dufault; B C Martocchio
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.208

Review 9.  Hope and quality of life, two central issues for cancer patients: a theoretical analysis.

Authors:  T Rustøen
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Response of patients in phase II studies of chemotherapy in ovarian cancer: implications for patient treatment and the design of phase II trials.

Authors:  G Blackledge; F Lawton; C Redman; K Kelly
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Providing integrative care in the pre-chemotherapy setting: a pragmatic controlled patient-centered trial with implications for supportive cancer care.

Authors:  Eran Ben-Arye; Hadeel Dahly; Yael Keshet; Jamal Dagash; Noah Samuels
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Sandra A Mitchell; Amylou C Dueck; Ethan Basch; David Cella; Carolyn Miller Reilly; Lori M Minasian; Andrea M Denicoff; Ann M O'Mara; Michael J Fisch; Cynthia Chauhan; Neil K Aaronson; Corneel Coens; Deborah Watkins Bruner
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Quality of life, symptoms and care needs in patients with persistent or recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Vivian E von Gruenigen; Helen Q Huang; David Cella; MichaelA Zevon; Jason A LaChance; Joan L Walker; Ritu Salani; Susan C Modesitt; Robert T Morris; William H Bradley; Matthew P Boente; Lari Wenzel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Prevalence and its associated psychological variables of symptoms of depression and anxiety among ovarian cancer patients in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chun Li Liu; Li Liu; Yi Zhang; Xiao Ze Dai; Hui Wu
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Impact of Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer on Quality of Life and Outlook for the Future.

Authors:  Nicoletta Colombo; Domenica Lorusso; Paolo Scollo
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Pre-treatment expectations of patients with spinal metastases: what do we know and what can we learn from other disciplines? A systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  R Gal; D Oostinga; H Wessels; J J Verlaan; R Charest-Morin; C G Fisher; H M Verkooijen; A L Versteeg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Coping Strategies among Malaysian Women with Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Yew Kong Lee; K Asokan Praveena; Yin Ling Woo; Chirk Jenn Ng
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2020-10-15

8.  The Correlation Between Quality of Life and Positive Psychological Resources in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinxin Zhao; Siqi Tong; Ye Yang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-16

9.  Development of the Japanese version of an information aid to provide accurate information on prognosis to patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kikuo Nakano; Yoshihiro Kitahara; Mineyo Mito; Misato Seno; Shoji Sunada
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.234

10.  Predictive Biomarkers and Patient Outcome in Platinum-Resistant (PLD-Treated) Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Isabel J Dionísio de Sousa; Durval S Marques; Catarina Príncipe; Raquel V Portugal; Sule Canberk; Hugo Prazeres; José M Lopes; Etel R P Gimba; Raquel T Lima; Paula Soares
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.