Literature DB >> 8153831

Erector spinae lever arm length variations with changes in spinal curvature.

P Tveit1, K Daggfeldt, S Hetland, A Thorstensson.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging was used to study the effect of different curvatures in the lumbar spine on lever arm lengths of the erector spinae musculature. Eleven subjects were instructed to simulate static lifts while lying supine in a magnetic resonance camera with the lumbar spine either in kyphosis or lordosis. A sagittal image of the spine was obtained to analyze the lumbosacral angle and to guide the imaging of transverse sections through each disc (L1/L2 to L5/S1). Images were analyzed for lever arm lengths of the erector spinae muscle (ES) and the erector spinae aponeurosis (ESA), the latter functioning as a tendon for superiorly positioned ES muscle portions. The lumbosacral angle (between superior surfaces of S1 and L4) averaged 44 degrees in the lordosed, 26 degrees in the kyphosed and 41 degrees in a neutral supine position. In lordosis, the lever arm lengths were significantly longer than in kyphosis for all levels, averaging 60-63 mm (ES) and 82-86 mm (ESA). The corresponding values for kyphosis were 49-57 mm (ES) and 67-77 mm (ESA), respectively. Thus, there was a considerable effect (10-24%) of lumbar curvature on lever arm lengths for the back extensor muscles. The change in leverage will affect the need for extensor muscle force and thus the magnitude of compression in the lumbar spine in loading situations such as lifting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8153831     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  16 in total

Review 1.  The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations.

Authors:  F H Willard; A Vleeming; M D Schuenke; L Danneels; R Schleip
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.

Authors:  Babak Bazrgari; Aboulfazl Shirazi-Adl; Navid Arjmand
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  [Stabilization of the osteoporotic spine from a biomechanical viewpoint].

Authors:  C-E Heyde; A Rohlmann; U Weber; R Kayser
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Relationship between sagittal spinal curves geometry and isokinetic trunk muscle strength in adults.

Authors:  Walaa Elsayed; Ahmed Farrag; Qassim Muaidi; Nora Almulhim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of MRI-defined back muscles volume between patients with ankylosing spondylitis and control patients with chronic back pain: age and spinopelvic alignment matched study.

Authors:  Doo Hee Bok; Jihye Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Age-related hyperkyphosis: update of its potential causes and clinical impacts-narrative review.

Authors:  Tayebeh Roghani; Minoo Khalkhali Zavieh; Farideh Dehghan Manshadi; Nicole King; Wendy Katzman
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  A review of anatomical and mechanical factors affecting vertebral body integrity.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Alison M Greig; John D Wark; Nicola L Fazzalari; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2004-10-12       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Back and hip extensor muscles fatigue in healthy subjects: task-dependency effect of two variants of the Sorensen test.

Authors:  Annick Champagne; Martin Descarreaux; Danik Lafond
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Vertebral body integrity: a review of various anatomical factors involved in the lumbar region.

Authors:  L V Prabhu; V V Saralaya; M M Pai; A V Ranade; G Singh; S Madhyastha
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 5.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.