Literature DB >> 23179407

Identifying radiological needs of referring clinicians.

Li Zhang1, Antje Hefke, Jens Figiel, Ulrike Schwarz, Marga Rominger, Klaus Jochen Klose.   

Abstract

To provide prospective information about quality- and satisfaction-related product features in radiology, a customer-centered approach for acquiring clinicians' requirements and their prioritizations is essential. We introduced the Kano model for the first time in radiology to obtain such information. A Kano questionnaire, consisting of pairs of questions regarding 13 clinician requirements related to computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) access and report turnaround time (RTT), was developed and administered. Each requirement was assigned a Kano category, and its satisfaction and dissatisfaction coefficients were calculated and presented in a Kano diagram. The data were stratified based on different clinics and on staff and resident clinicians. The time interval was evaluated between the completion of an examination and the first attempt to access the report by a clinician. Consultation for modality selection and scheduling and access to CT within 24 h and RTT within 8 to 24 h were considered as must-be requirements. Access to CT within 4 h and within 8 h, access to MRI within 8 h and within 24 h, and access to RTT within 4 h were one-dimensional requirements. The extension of operation time for CT or MRI, as well as MRI access within 4 h, was considered attractive. Eight out of nine clinics considered RTT within 8 h as a must-be requirement. There were differences in responses both among different clinics and between staff and resident clinicians. Access attempts to reports by clinicians in the first 4 h after the examination completion accounted for 65 % of CTs and 49 % of MRIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23179407      PMCID: PMC3649054          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9551-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Radiologist report turnaround time: impact of pay-for-performance measures.

Authors:  Giles W L Boland; Elkan F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Evaluation of MRI acquisition workflow with lean six sigma method: case study of liver and knee examinations.

Authors:  Christopher J Roth; Daniel T Boll; Lisa K Wall; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Survey of the use of quality indicators in academic radiology departments.

Authors:  Silvia Ondategui-Parra; Sukru M Erturk; Pablo R Ros
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Cottage industry to postindustrial care--the revolution in health care delivery.

Authors:  Stephen J Swensen; Gregg S Meyer; Eugene C Nelson; Gordon C Hunt; David B Pryor; Jed I Weissberg; Gary S Kaplan; Jennifer Daley; Gary R Yates; Mark R Chassin; Brent C James; Donald M Berwick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Improvement of report workflow and productivity using speech recognition--a follow-up study.

Authors:  Tomi Kauppinen; Mika P Koivikko; Juhani Ahovuo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Enhancing same-day access to magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Antje Hefke; Jens Figiel; Ulrike Schwarz; Marga Rominger; Klaus Jochen Klose
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing.

Authors:  S E Seltzer; P Kelly; D F Adams; B F Chiango; M A Viera; E Fener; R Rondeau; N Kazanjian; G Laffel; K Shaffer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department.

Authors:  Enrico Cavagna; Riccardo Berletti; Francesco Schiavon; Barbara Scarsi; Giuseppe Barbato
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Maximizing outpatient computed tomography productivity using multiple technologists.

Authors:  Giles W L Boland; Margaret P Houghton; David G Marchione; William McCormick
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.532

View more
  1 in total

1.  Subspecialized radiology reporting: productivity and impact on the turnaround times for radiology reports in a middle-income country.

Authors:  Nupur Verma; Gabriel Sartori Pacini; Juliana Pastorino Torrada; Diogo Martins de Oliveira; Matheus Zanon; Edson Marchiori; Tan-Lucien Mohammed; Bruno Hochhegger
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.