Literature DB >> 8131355

Anterior lumbar fusion options. Technique and graft materials.

J A Kozak1, A E Heilman, J P O'Brien.   

Abstract

The biomechanical requirements of the ideal lumbar interbody fusion are important in the surgical treatment of the vertebral endplates and graft selection. A series of 45 patients with anterior lumbar fusion were reviewed retrospectively. The fusion was performed with a composite construct consisting of femoral allograft cross-sections and allograft cancellous bone. Preparation of vertebral endplates consisted of scraping the endplate until punctate bleeding appeared. The major part of the endplate was preserved to withstand interspace distraction and stability. A 97% fusion rate was achieved based on flexion and extension analysis with a six- to 12-month follow-up period. A final average interspace distraction of 2.39 mm was reported. The graft should consist of a rigid structure that exceeds physiologic loads anticipated in the postoperative period, and the composition to promote arthrodesis. Anterior lumbar fusion with femoral allograft is an excellent procedure, but long-term further follow-up studies and statistical data are essential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8131355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  23 in total

1.  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion: does stable anterior fixation matter?

Authors:  S S Madan; J M Harley; N R Boeree
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal.

Authors:  Christian H Flamme; Nadine von der Heide; Caroline Heymann; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  CT-based classification of long spinal allograft fusion.

Authors:  G H Tan; B G Goss; P J Thorpe; R P Williams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The influence of cage positioning and cage type on cage migration and fusion rates in patients with monosegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior fixation.

Authors:  Alexander Abbushi; Mario Cabraja; Ulrich-Wilhelm Thomale; Christian Woiciechowsky; Stefan Nikolaus Kroppenstedt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity.

Authors:  Jacob Januszewski; Andrew C Vivas; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

6.  Morphometry of the iliolumbar artery and the iliolumbar veins and their correlations with the lumbosacral trunk and the obturator nerve.

Authors:  Chandrika Gurulingappa Teli; Nilesh Netaji Kate; Usha Kothandaraman
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using compressive bone graft with allograft and autograft in the pyogenic discitis.

Authors:  Ki Chan An; Joo Yong Kim; Tae Hyoung Kim; Jin Suck Kim; Dae Hyoun Park; Jeon Gyo Kim; Tae Woo Sung
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-03-09

8.  Analysis of intraoperative difficulties and management of operative complications in revision anterior exposure of the lumbar spine: a report of 25 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; William Delblond; Alexandre Poignard; Jérôme Allain
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Patrick Strube; Julia F Funk; Christian Gross; Hans-Joachim Mönig; Carsten Perka; Axel Pruss
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of instrumented anterior interbody fusion with instrumented circumferential lumbar fusion.

Authors:  S S Madan; N R Boeree
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.