Literature DB >> 19148687

Allogenic versus autologous cancellous bone in lumbar segmental spondylodesis: a randomized prospective study.

Michael Putzier1, Patrick Strube, Julia F Funk, Christian Gross, Hans-Joachim Mönig, Carsten Perka, Axel Pruss.   

Abstract

The current gold standard in lumbar fusion consists of transpedicular fixation in combination with an interbody interponate of autologous bone from iliac crest. Because of the limited availability of autologous bone as well as the still relevant donor site morbidity after iliac crest grafting the need exists for alternative grafts with a comparable outcome. Forty patients with degenerative spinal disease were treated with a monosegmental spondylodesis (ventrally, 1 PEEK-cage; dorsally, a screw and rod system), and randomly placed in two groups. In group 1, autogenous iliac crest cancellous bone was used as a cage filling. In group 2 the cages were filled with an allogenic cancellous bone graft. Following 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, the clinical outcome was determined on the basis of: the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire; patient satisfaction; patient willingness to undergo the operation again; and a visual analog scale for pain. The radiological outcome was based on both fusion rate (radiographs, computed tomography), and on the bone mineral density of the grafts. After 6 months, the X-rays of the patients in group 2 had a significantly lower rate of fusion. Aside from this, there were no further significant differences. After 12 months, radiological results showed a similar fusion rate in both groups. Donor site complications consisted of five patients with hematoma, and three patients with persistent pain in group 1. No implant complications were observed. If a bone bank is available for support and accepting the low risk of possible transmission of infectious diseases, freeze-dried allogenic cancellous bone can be used for monosegmental spondylodeses. The results demonstrated an equivalent clinical outcome, as well as similar fusion rates following a 12-month period. This is in despite of a delayed consolidation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19148687      PMCID: PMC3234005          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0875-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  38 in total

1.  Biological cages.

Authors:  M E Janssen; C Nguyen; R Beckham; A Larson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions.

Authors:  P C McAfee; S D Boden; J W Brantigan; R D Fraser; S D Kuslich; T R Oxland; M M Panjabi; C D Ray; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Validation of the sterilization procedure of allogeneic avital bone transplants using peracetic acid-ethanol.

Authors:  A Pruss; B Baumann; M Seibold; M Kao; K Tintelnot; R von Versen; H Radtke; T Dörner; G Pauli; U B Göbel
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.856

4.  Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.

Authors:  Edward R G Santos; David G Goss; Russel K Morcom; Robert D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute.

Authors:  Scott D Boden
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Spinal-fusion surgery - the case for restraint.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Alf Nachemson; Sohail K Mirza
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Circumferential fusion improves outcome in comparison with instrumented posterolateral fusion: long-term results of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tina S Videbaek; Finn B Christensen; Rikke Soegaard; Ebbe S Hansen; Kristian Høy; Peter Helmig; Bent Niedermann; Søren P Eiskjoer; Cody E Bünger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Results after anterior-posterior lumbar spinal fusion: 2-5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Thomas Niemeyer; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Henry Halm; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine using a carbon fiber ALIF cage implant versus autogenous bone graft: a comparative study.

Authors:  Boris Zelle; Friedhelm Konig; Alfred Enderle; Rudolf Bertagnoli; Jochen Dorner
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2002-10

10.  [Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic pain].

Authors:  H U Gerbershagen; G Lindena; J Korb; S Kramer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.107

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

3.  [Safety and efficacy of an electron beam melting technique-manufactured titanium mesh cage for lumbar interbody fusion].

Authors:  Timo Zippelius; Patrick Strube; Farid Suleymanov; Michael Putzier; Alexander Hölzl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Comparing the process of creeping substitution between allograft bone and local bone grafting in lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Chun Jiang; ZhenZhou Feng; Xiaoxing Jiang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Fa-Ming Chen; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 29.190

Review 6.  [Bone banks : The state-of-the-art].

Authors:  A Pruß; U Kalus
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The effect of iliac crest autograft on the outcome of fusion in the setting of degenerative spondylolisthesis: a subgroup analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).

Authors:  Kristen Radcliff; Raymond Hwang; Alan Hilibrand; Harvey E Smith; Jordan Gruskay; Jon D Lurie; Wenyan Zhao; Todd Albert; James Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Results of lumbar spondylodeses using different bone grafting materials after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Authors:  Nicolas Heinz vonderHoeh; Anna Voelker; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Monosegmental anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the SynFix-LR™ device. A prospective 2-year follow-up study].

Authors:  E Hoff; P Strube; C Gross; T Hartwig; M Putzier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Osamu Nemoto; Takashi Asazuma; Yoshiyuki Yato; Hideaki Imabayashi; Hiroki Yasuoka; Akira Fujikawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.