Literature DB >> 17497188

CT-based classification of long spinal allograft fusion.

G H Tan1, B G Goss, P J Thorpe, R P Williams.   

Abstract

Anterior column reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine by structural allograft has an increased potential for biological fusion when compared to synthetic reconstructive options. Estimation of cortical union and trabecular in-growth is, however, traditionally based on plain radiography, a technique lacking in sensitivity. A new assessment method of bony union using high-speed spiral CT imaging is proposed which reflects the gradually increasing biological stability of the construct. Grade I (complete fusion) implies cortical union of the allograft and central trabecular continuity. Grade II (partial fusion) implies cortical union of the structural allograft with partial trabecular incorporation. Grade III (unipolar pseudarthrosis) denotes superior or inferior cortical non-union of the central allograft with partial trabecular discontinuity centrally and Grade IV (bipolar pseudarthrosis) suggests both superior and inferior cortical non-union with a complete lack of central trabecular continuity. Twenty-five patients underwent anterior spinal reconstruction for a single level burst fracture between T4 and L5. At a minimum of two years follow up the subjects underwent high-speed spiral CT scanning through the reconstructed region of the thoracolumbar spine. The classification showed satisfactory interobserver (kappa score = 0.91) and intraobserver (kappa score = 0.95) reliability. The use of high-speed CT imaging in the assessment of structural allograft union may allow a more accurate assessment of union. The classification system presented allows a reproducible categorization of allograft incorporation with implications for treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17497188      PMCID: PMC2223338          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0376-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

Review 1.  Symposium: a critical discrepancy-a criteria of successful arthrodesis following interbody spinal fusions.

Authors:  P C McAfee; S D Boden; J W Brantigan; R D Fraser; S D Kuslich; T R Oxland; M M Panjabi; C D Ray; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.

Authors:  Edward R G Santos; David G Goss; Russel K Morcom; Robert D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Interspace distraction and graft subsidence after anterior lumbar fusion with femoral strut allograft.

Authors:  A Kumar; J A Kozak; B J Doherty; J H Dickson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Posterior intervertebral body fusion. A 25-year study.

Authors:  C G Hutter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Long structural allografts in the treatment of anterior spinal column defects.

Authors:  Kern Singh; Christopher J DeWald; Kim W Hammerberg; Ronald L DeWald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Assessment of bony union after interbody fusion of the lumbar spine using a biplanar radiographic technique.

Authors:  M Pearcy; S Burrough
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1982

7.  Reliability of radiologic assessment of fusion: cervical fibular allograft model.

Authors:  Sagun K Tuli; Peng Chen; Marc E Eichler; Eric J Woodard
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Comparison of plain radiographs with CT scan to evaluate interbody fusion following the use of titanium interbody cages and transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Rajesh R Shah; Saeed Mohammed; Asif Saifuddin; Benjamin A Taylor
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Anterior spinal arthrodesis with structural cortical allografts and instrumentation for spine tumor surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Andrew C Hecht; Thomas F DeLaney; Peter A Chapman; Francis J Hornicek; Frank X Pedlow
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Fusion rate: a time-to-event phenomenon.

Authors:  Sagun K Tuli; Jayshree Tuli; Peng Chen; Eric J Woodard
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2004-07
View more
  22 in total

1.  Approach to interpret images produced by new generations of multidetector CT scanners in post-operative spine.

Authors:  Rania Zeitoun; Manar Hussein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Francesco Langella; Marco Damilano; Matteo Pejrona; Josip Buric; Maryem Ismael; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Quantitative in vivo fusion assessment by (18)F-fluoride PET/CT following en bloc spondylectomy.

Authors:  Matthias Pumberger; Vikas Prasad; Claudia Druschel; Alexander C Disch; Winfried Brenner; Klaus-Dieter Schaser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive transaxial lumbosacral interbody fusion: a ten year single-centre experience.

Authors:  Dick J Zeilstra; Victor E Staartjes; Marc L Schröder
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Study on accuracy and interobserver reliability of the assessment of odontoid fracture union using plain radiographs or CT scans.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Klaus Kolb; Juliane Zenner; Jeremy Reynolds; Marcel Dvorak; Frank Acosta; Rosemarie Forstner; Michael Mayer; Mark Tauber; Alexander Auffarth; Anton Kathrein; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Radiological evaluation of fusion patterns after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: institutional case series.

Authors:  Luca Proietti; Andrea Perna; Luca Ricciardi; Caterina Fumo; Domenico Alessandro Santagada; Ilaria Giannelli; Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli; Antonio Leone
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  MIS-TLIF versus O-TLIF for single-level degenerative stenosis: study protocol for randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Olga N Leonova; Evgeny A Cherepanov; Aleksandr V Krutko
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Predictors of Complications and Unfavorable Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Surgery Treatment in Elderly Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spine Pathologies (Case Series).

Authors:  Vladimir Klimov; Aleksey Evsyukov; Evgeniya Amelina; Sergey Ryabykh; Alexander Simonovich
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 9.  Strategy in the surgical treatment of primary spinal tumors.

Authors:  Richard Williams; Matthew Foote; Hamish Deverall
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2012-11-27

10.  Matched Comparison of Fusion Rates between Hydroxyapatite Demineralized Bone Matrix and Autograft in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Dae Hwan Kim; Nam Lee; Dong Ah Shin; Seong Yi; Keung Nyun Kim; Yoon Ha
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.