Literature DB >> 8131048

Changes in early 'automatic' postural responses associated with the prior-planning and execution of a compensatory step.

W E McIlroy1, B E Maki.   

Abstract

There is growing interest in the perturbation-evoked stepping response as an important element in the movement repertoire to maintain upright stance. It is possible that there is an important relationship between the well-documented, early 'automatic' postural responses and subsequent stepping responses. In this study, we characterize changes in early 'automatic' postural responses associated with the prior-planning and execution of a compensatory (i.e. stabilizing) stepping response. Seven subjects were tested on a 'moveable' platform which could translate in the anterior-posterior direction. The subjects' responses were analyzed for two different tasks: (1) 'constrained' (keep feet in place), and (2) perturbation-cued 'reaction time' stepping (step when the platform moves). Only responses to forward platform translations were analyzed in this study. Responses for each of these tasks were evoked using two different perturbation magnitudes. The higher magnitude was sufficiently large to evoke stepping responses in a large proportion of the 'constrained' trials despite instructions not to step. We compared the magnitude of the early evoked postural reactions between trials when subjects had pre-planned a stepping response against trials characterized by either (1) no stepping or (2) unplanned stepping responses. The results revealed that the early 'automatic' responses in tibialis anterior were always present in all subjects and all tasks. However, the evoked 'automatic' responses were approximately 36% smaller (over the first 50 ms) when followed by a pre-planned stepping response ('reaction-time' task). This task-related difference was similar for both perturbation magnitudes i.e. it occurred regardless of whether the 'constrained' tasks involved feet-in-place responses (small perturbations) or stepping responses (large perturbations).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8131048     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)91536-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  21 in total

1.  Movement sway: changes in postural sway during voluntary shifts of the center of pressure.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; Sandra S Ferreira; Silvana A Wieczorek; Marcos Duarte
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reaching to recover balance in unpredictable circumstances: is online visual control of the reach-to-grasp reaction necessary or sufficient?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Sandra M McKay; Emily C King; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The use of peripheral vision to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp balance-recovery reactions.

Authors:  Emily C King; Sandra M McKay; Kenneth C Cheng; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Adaptive control of gait stability in reducing slip-related backward loss of balance.

Authors:  T Bhatt; J D Wening; Y-C Pai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Deceleration affects anticipatory and reactive components of triggered postural responses.

Authors:  Mark G Carpenter; Alf Thorstensson; Andrew G Cresswell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  External postural perturbations induce multiple anticipatory postural adjustments when subjects cannot pre-select their stepping foot.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Changes in the activity of the cerebral cortex relate to postural response modification when warned of a perturbation.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Katsuo Fujiwara; Hidehito Tomita; Naoe Furune; Kenji Kunita; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Postural control in response to a perturbation: role of vision and additional support.

Authors:  Vennila Krishnan; Krishnan Vennila; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Common muscle synergies for control of center of mass and force in nonstepping and stepping postural behaviors.

Authors:  Stacie A Chvatal; Gelsy Torres-Oviedo; Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Can Recovery Foot Placement Affect Older Adults' Slip-Fall Severity?

Authors:  Shuaijie Wang; Xuan Liu; Anna Lee; Yi-Chung Pai
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.