Literature DB >> 8126538

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade does not alter sensory evoked potentials.

T B Sloan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether changes in nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade (NMB) alter the latency or amplitude of visual, brain stem auditory, or median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials.
METHODS: Ten adult cynomologous Macaca fascicularis monkeys were studied during continuous ketamine anesthesia infusion. The NMB was incrementally adjusted between no block and complete block using infusions of vecuronium or atracurium. The NMB was measured by observing the mechanical response of the hand muscles to train-of-four stimulation of the median nerve and by quantification of the peak-to-peak electromyographic activity of the thenar muscles to supramaximal median nerve stimulation. The following variables were measured: the latencies of the three major peaks of the brain stem auditory evoked potential, the latency and amplitude of the cortical visual evoked potential, the latency of the spinal cord response, and the latency and amplitude of the cortical median nerve somatosensory evoked response.
RESULTS: No statistically significant changes were observed for any evoked response variable measured at any degree of NMB when compared with values obtained in the unblocked control state.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that fluctuating degrees of NMB may contribute little to changes in these evoked potentials during intraoperative monitoring, given the testing parameters used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8126538     DOI: 10.1007/bf01651460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  20 in total

1.  VISUALLY EVOKED RESPONSE IN ANESTHETIZED MAN WITH AND WITHOUT INDUCED MUSCLE PARALYSIS.

Authors:  E F DOMINO; G CORSSEN
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1964-05-08       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for intraoperative monitoring of sensory evoked potentials.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Monitoring of neuromuscular transmission in anesthetized man by a bulb-transducer assembly.

Authors:  A Baraka
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1973 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Comparison of neuromuscular blockade in upper facial and hypothenar muscles.

Authors:  M P Paloheimo; R C Wilson; H L Edmonds; L F Lucas; A N Triantafillou
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1988-10

5.  Influence of succinylcholine on middle component auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  L A Harker; E Hosick; R J Voots; M I Mendel
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1977-03

6.  Clinical recovery and train-of-four ratio measured mechanically and electromyographically following atracurium.

Authors:  J Engbaek; D Ostergaard; J Viby-Mogensen; L T Skovgaard
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  The effect of ketamine on human somatosensory evoked potentials and its modification by nitrous oxide.

Authors:  A Schubert; M G Licina; P J Lineberry
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Transtentorial brain herniation in the monkey: analysis of brain stem auditory and somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  J L Stone; R F Ghaly; K S Subramanian; P Roccaforte; J Kane
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Changes in the somatosensory evoked potential during and immediately following temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion predict somatosensory cortex ischemic lesions in monkeys.

Authors:  R Dowman; D P Boisvert; A W Gelb; C Tang; A M Lam; B Meilke
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.177

10.  Spinal and cortical somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during corrective spinal surgery with 108 patients.

Authors:  T P Ryan; R H Britt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Muscle relaxant use during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Authors:  Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Delayed evoked potentials in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) under midazolam-butorphanol-isoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Pin Huan Yu; Yi-Tse Hsiao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.