Literature DB >> 3750068

Spinal and cortical somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during corrective spinal surgery with 108 patients.

T P Ryan, R H Britt.   

Abstract

To reduce the incidence of neurologic complications following spinal surgery, somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were monitored in 108 patients. An electrode with four in-line contacts was used to record spinal SEPs in the epidural space in 33 patients at locations both rostral and caudal to the surgical site. Cortical SEPs were successfully monitored in 107/108 patients and spinal SEPs in all 33 attempted epidurally. Spinal conduction velocities were found to range from 43.9 to 110.5 m/s depending on vertebral level and the time location of the measured peak in the response waveform. Frequency power spectra of the SEP waveforms were found to be a reliable adjunct to peak latency amplitude analysis in the time domain. Use of caudal and rostral epidural, subcortical, and cortical electrode sites were found to be the most reliable technique for the maximum patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3750068     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198605000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of time-frequency distribution techniques for analysis of spinal somatosensory evoked potential.

Authors:  Y Hu; K D Luk; W W Lu; A Holmes; J C Leong
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Application of time-frequency analysis to somatosensory evoked potential for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring.

Authors:  Y Hu; K D K Luk; W W Lu; J C Y Leong
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Physical medicine and rehabilitation: somatosensory evoked potentials in monitoring spinal operations.

Authors:  J C Slimp; W C Stolov
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-08

4.  Usefulness of epidurally evoked cortical potential monitoring during cervicomedullary glioma surgery.

Authors:  T Morioka; K Fujii; S Tobimatsu; M Fukui; Y Sakaguchi
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-01

5.  Intraoperative control by somatosensory evoked potentials in the treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathy. Results in 210 cases.

Authors:  C Sebastián; J P Raya; M Ortega; E Olalla; V Lemos; R Romero
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Subpial spinal evoked potentials in patients undergoing junctional dorsal root entry zone coagulation for pain relief.

Authors:  B Prestor; T Zgur; V V Dolenc
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade does not alter sensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  T B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-01

8.  Component analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials for identifying spinal cord injury location.

Authors:  Yazhou Wang; Guangsheng Li; Keith D K Luk; Yong Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Time-frequency component analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials in rats.

Authors:  Zhi-Guo Zhang; Jun-Lin Yang; Shing-Chow Chan; Keith Dip-Kei Luk; Yong Hu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.