Literature DB >> 8126149

A comparison of lateral versus anterior-posterior spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for the diagnosis of osteopenia.

J S Finkelstein1, R L Cleary, J P Butler, R Antonelli, B H Mitlak, D J Deraska, J C Zamora-Quezada, R M Neer.   

Abstract

Because bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at various sites differ in the relative amounts of cortical and trabecular bone that they assess, they also differ in their sensitivity for detecting osteopenia. Lateral spine dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allows measurement of BMD of the vertebral bodies, which contain mainly trabecular bone, without contribution from the posterior vertebral elements, which are rich in cortical bone. Thus, we hypothesized that lateral spine DXA would detect osteopenia more frequently than anterior-posterior (AP) spine DXA. To assess the ability of DXA to estimate trabecular bone mass, we compared AP and lateral DXA spine measurements with trabecular bone measurements by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in 58 patients. We then compared AP vs. lateral spine DXA measurements in 1) 300 women referred for routine bone densitometry, 2) 30 glucocorticoid-treated women, and 3) 44 women with vertebral compression fractures. To compare short term reproducibility, we performed repeat AP and lateral DXA scans in 50 women. The association between QCT and DXA measurements was stronger when DXA measurements were made in the lateral (r = 0.784) or midlateral (r = 0.823) projection than in the AP (r = 0.571) projection. The association of BMD with age was stronger when DXA measurements were made in the lateral (r = 0.536) or midlateral (r = 0.536) projection than in the AP (r = 0.382) projection. The declines in BMD with age for AP, lateral, and midlateral DXA measurements were 0.48%, 0.60%, and 0.88%/yr, respectively. In the women referred for routine densitometry, lateral DXA measurements were significantly (P < 0.05) more abnormal than AP measurements compared with those in young women. This was also true in the women treated with glucocorticoids and women with vertebral compression fractures. Lateral DXA often detected osteopenia in patients whose AP DXA was normal. The 95% confidence limits for changes in BMD attributable to measurement error for AP, lateral, and midlateral DXA were 0.027, 0.038, and 0.057 g/cm2, respectively. These results indicate that lateral DXA measurements identify patients with osteopenia more often than AP DXA measurements, probably because lateral DXA more accurately estimates trabecular bone mass. Short term reproducibility of lateral DXA is nearly as good as that for AP DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8126149     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.78.3.8126149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  28 in total

1.  Underestimation of bone loss of the spine with posterior-anterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  William A Bauman; Steven Kirshblum; Christopher Cirnigliaro; Gail F Forrest; Ann M Spungen
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Spinal bone mineral assessment in postmenopausal women: a comparison between dual X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  W Yu; C C Glüer; S Grampp; M Jergas; T Fuerst; C Y Wu; Y Lu; B Fan; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Bone quality in the lumbar spine in high-performance athletes.

Authors:  D Sabo; L Bernd; J Pfeil; A Reiter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Bone mineral density & T-scores.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Correlations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography, and single photon absorptiometry with spinal and non-spinal fractures.

Authors:  F W Lafferty; D Y Rowland
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: a comparison with posteroanterior spine, hip and total-body DXA.

Authors:  G M Blake; R J Herd; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Anteroposterior versus lateral bone mineral density of spine assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Del Rio; F Pons; M Huguet; F J Setoain; J Setoain
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05

9.  Failure load of thoracic vertebrae correlates with lumbar bone mineral density measured by DXA.

Authors:  M Moro; A T Hecker; M L Bouxsein; E R Myers
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  Bisphosphonates to prevent osteoporosis in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew R Smith
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.