Literature DB >> 644389

Disc excision and spine fusion in the management of lumbar disc disease. A minimum ten-year followup.

J W Frymoyer, E Hanley, J Howe, D Kuhlmann, R Matteri.   

Abstract

Seventy-nine percent of 312 patients who underwent lumbar disc surgery were evaluated at least 10 years postoperatively (mean equal to 13.7 years). Residual back and nerve root symptoms and functional impairment were equally as common among the 143 patients who underwent fusion as they were among the 64 patients who did not. Thirty percent of the patients whose spines were fused and 37.7% of those patients whose spines were not fused were considered long-term failures because of persistent symptoms or the need for reoperation. Thirty-seven percent of the fusion patients had persistent graft donor site symptoms. Examined patients showed a high percentage of residual neurologic defects. An unexplained positive Trendelenburg sign was present in 14.8% of the fusion patients and in 18.2% of the patients whose spines were not fused. Although retrospective studies often have problems of accuracy, this analysis confirms other observations that midline spinal fusion offers few benefits in the management of lumbar disc disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 644389     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-197803000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

Review 1.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Single-Level PLIF: Comparison between Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Chang Hun Yu; Jung Eun Lee; Jae Jun Yang; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-05-02

3.  Early neuromuscular customized training after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Monica Millisdotter; Björn Strömqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Results of lumbar discectomy: a study using 15 different evaluation methods.

Authors:  D S Korres; G Loupassis; K Stamos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-24

6.  Accelerated L5-S1 Segment Degeneration after Spinal Fusion on and above L4-5 : Minimum 4-Year Follow-Up Results.

Authors:  Jeong Yoon Park; Dong Kyu Chin; Yong Eun Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28

7.  Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: follow-up of 237 patients.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen; C A Carlson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 8.  Recent advances in the treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  A Nachemson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Clinical instability of the lumbar spine after microdiscectomy.

Authors:  E Kotilainen; S Valtonen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Additional decompression at adjacent segments leads to adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF.

Authors:  Masayuki Miyagi; Osamu Ikeda; Seiji Ohtori; Yoshikazu Tsuneizumi; Yukio Someya; Masataka Shibayama; Yasufumi Ogawa; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Hiroto Kamoda; Gen Arai; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Yasuchika Aoki; Tomoaki Toyone; Toshio Ooi; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.