Literature DB >> 8122128

Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography: basics and clinical considerations.

B M Tsui1, X Zhao, E C Frey, W H McCartney.   

Abstract

Although quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) has been the goal of much research effort for a number of years, only recently has it received wide interest, especially for clinical applications. It has been increasingly recognized that the achievement of quantitative SPECT will increase the accuracy of measurements, such as dimensions of specific regions of interest, absolute amount of radioactivity, and dosimetry calculations, and substantially reduce reconstruction image artifacts and distortions, thus, greatly improving clinical diagnosis. This article provides a review of the definition of terms, major factors affecting SPECT quantitation and their degrading effects on SPECT image quality, and methods to compensate for these effects. Compensation methods include those that make certain approximations for ease of implementation and those that provide more accurate compensation by modeling the imaging process more exactly, usually at the cost of increased complexity and computational requirements. Different reconstruction and compensation methods may be compared through the use of phantom cardiac and brain SPECT studies. The clinical efficacy of the methods may be demonstrated by applying them to a clinical thallium-201 myocardial perfusion SPECT study. The results clearly demonstrate that, by modeling the imaging process and/or image degrading factors three-dimensionally, quantitative reconstruction and compensation methods provide the best image quality and quantitative accuracy. Important research efforts and developmental work being conducted currently to bring quantitative SPECT into routine clinical use are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8122128     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-2998(05)80248-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of geometrical distortion and activity distribution after attenuation correction: A SPECT phantom study.

Authors:  Sara Lappi; Simonetta Lazzari; Graziella Sarti; Pierluigi Pieri
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Activity optimization method in SPECT: a comparison with ROC analysis.

Authors:  Marlén Pérez Díaz; Oscar Díaz Rizo; Adlin López Díaz; Eric Estévez Aparicio; Reinaldo Roque Díaz
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 3.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  B M Tsui; E C Frey; K J LaCroix; D S Lalush; W H McCartney; M A King; G T Gullberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 2. Attenuation compensation algorithms.

Authors:  M A King; B M Tsui; T S Pan; S J Glick; E J Soares
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  What is the current status of quantification and nuclear medicine in cardiology?

Authors:  G Hör
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-07

Review 7.  Accuracy and precision of radioactivity quantification in nuclear medicine images.

Authors:  Eric C Frey; John L Humm; Michael Ljungberg
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.446

8.  Optimum tomographic reconstruction parameters for HMPAO brain SPET imaging: a practical approach based on subjective and objective indexes.

Authors:  P O Kotzki; D Mariano-Goulart; M Quiquere; F Lyonnet; M Zanca; M Rossi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-07

Review 9.  Where are we with nuclear medicine in pediatrics?

Authors:  H R Nadel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-12

10.  Toward quantitative small animal pinhole SPECT: assessment of quantitation accuracy prior to image compensations.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Chen; Yuchuan Wang; Jason J S Lee; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.