Literature DB >> 8120177

Perceptions of colorectal cancer in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population.

J H Price1.   

Abstract

This study examined 500 low socioeconomic adults' perceptions and practices regarding bowel cancer. At least 20 percent of respondents incorrectly believed homosexual men are more likely to develop bowel cancer, exercising regularly will not affect bowel cancer, bowel cancer does not run in families, and eating foods high in fat does not increase bowel cancer risks. Approximately 7 in 10 respondents did not perceive themselves as more susceptible to developing bowel cancer even though the same number of respondents acknowledged that poor people are more likely to develop bowel cancer. The majority (54 percent) believed that if you develop bowel cancer, it will kill you. The majority of respondents did not believe that fecal occult blood tests could help save their lives if they had bowel cancer since 90 percent perceived bowel cancer as incurable even if found early. The main barriers to screening for bowel cancer identified by the respondents were: being too embarrassed to have a proctoscopic exam (77%), not wanting to know if they had bowel cancer (78%), preferring to die rather than have their bowel removed for cancer (80%), and trouble with transportation (81%). Thirty percent of the respondents had personally done a stool occult blood test and the same number claimed they had a proctoscopic exam. The results of this survey indicate that there is considerable room for improvement in knowledge, perceptions, and practices of economically disadvantaged subjects regarding bowel cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8120177     DOI: 10.1007/bf01323966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  16 in total

1.  Compliance with colorectal cancer screening in a high-risk occupational group.

Authors:  A V Neale; R Y Demers; S Herman
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1989-12

2.  Knowledge of colorectal cancer and use of screening tests in persons 40-74 years of age.

Authors:  A P Polednak
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Cancer in the socioeconomically disadvantaged.

Authors:  H P Freeman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Attitudes of non-participants in an occupational based programme of screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Silman; P Mitchell
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1984-02

5.  Cancer of the colon and rectum: summary of a public attitude survey.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1983 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Assessment of attitudes toward mass screening for colorectal cancer and polyps.

Authors:  M H Spector; W B Applegate; S J Olmstead; P V DiVasto; B Skipper
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Estimates of costs and effects of screening for colorectal cancer in the United States.

Authors:  T Byers; R Gorsky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Predicting colon cancer screening behavior from health beliefs.

Authors:  F A Macrae; D J Hill; D J St John; A Ambikapathy; J F Garner
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Colon cancer incidence: recent trends in the United States.

Authors:  W H Chow; S S Devesa; W J Blot
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Knowledge of colorectal cancer among older persons.

Authors:  S P Weinrich; M C Weinrich; M D Boyd; E Johnson; M Frank-Stromborg
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.592

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  No association between colorectal cancer worry and screening uptake in Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Adana A Llanos; Michael L Pennell; Gregory S Young; Cathy M Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Facilitating factors for colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Randi L Wolf; Charles E Basch
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans.

Authors:  K Allen Greiner; Wendi Born; Nicole Nollen; Jasjit S Ahluwalia
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; B K Rimer; P R Lyna; A A Pradhan; M Conaway; C T Woods-Powell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-12

6.  Beliefs associated with fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use at a worksite colon cancer screening program.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Victoria L Champion; Gregory N Larkin; Terrell W Zollinger; Priscilla M Gerde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Barriers to screening colonoscopy for low-income Latino and white patients in an urban community health center.

Authors:  Alexander R Green; Angelleen Peters-Lewis; Sanja Percac-Lima; Joseph R Betancourt; James M Richter; Maria-Pamela R Janairo; Gloria B Gamba; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Jennifer S Ford; David Klein; Louis H Primavera; Tamara R Buckley; Traci R Stein; Moshe Shike; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

9.  Development of a brief survey on colon cancer screening knowledge and attitudes among veterans.

Authors:  Michael S Wolf; Alfred Rademaker; Charles L Bennett; M Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C Dolan; Terry C Davis; Franklin Medio; Dachao Liu; June Lee; Marian Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  The preference for an endoscopist specific sex: a link between ethnic origin, religious belief, socioeconomic status, and procedure type.

Authors:  Adi Lahat; Yehudith Assouline-Dayan; Lior H Katz; Herma H Fidder
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 2.711

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.