Literature DB >> 8119830

Increased recombination frequencies resulting from directional selection for geotaxis in Drosophila.

A B Korol1, K G Iliadi.   

Abstract

Several classes of models have been suggested to explain how natural selection can favour non-zero recombination. Directional and fluctuating selection, abiotic and biotic, and selection against harmful mutations seem to be the most plausible factors, but little has been done to test the problem experimentally. Here we show that long-term selection for positive or negative geotaxis in Drosophila melanogaster results in a dramatic increase in recombination rates in different genomic regions. The total increment in recombination for the genome portion considered is 78 cM for geo+ and 66 cM for geo-. Selection for negative geotaxis did not result in recombination changes in chromosome 2 whereas selection in the opposite direction caused nearly a four-fold increase in the b-cn segment and a significant, albeit not as high, increase in the adjacent regions, al-b and cn-vg. In chromosomes X and 3, a significant increase in recombination was found in both selected lines. In total, the increment in exchange frequency in chromosome X (y-cv-ct-v-car) was from 72.6 per cent (the control level) to 124.7 and 110.3 per cent geo- and geo+, respectively, whereas for the studied portion of chromosome 3 (ru-h-cu-sr-e) we obtained, correspondingly, 60.8, 76.4 and 73.8 per cent. Thus, in general, selection for geotaxis resulted in increased recombination frequencies regardless of the direction of selection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8119830     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1994.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  29 in total

1.  The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  T Lenormand; S P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The evolution of sex dimorphism in recombination.

Authors:  Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Ecological stress and sex evolution in soil microfungi.

Authors:  Isabella Grishkan; Abraham B Korol; Eviatar Nevo; Solomon P Wasser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Recombination can evolve in large finite populations given selection on sufficient loci.

Authors:  Mark M Iles; Kevin Walters; Chris Cannings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Lutz Becks; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Evolution of recombination due to random drift.

Authors:  N H Barton; Sarah P Otto
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Behaviour genetics of Drosophila: non-sexual behaviour.

Authors:  Seema Sisodia; B N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  The Hill-Robertson effect and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  Denis Roze; Nick H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Exceptionally high levels of recombination across the honey bee genome.

Authors:  Martin Beye; Irene Gattermeier; Martin Hasselmann; Tanja Gempe; Morten Schioett; John F Baines; David Schlipalius; Florence Mougel; Christine Emore; Olav Rueppell; Anu Sirviö; Ernesto Guzmán-Novoa; Greg Hunt; Michel Solignac; Robert E Page
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection.

Authors:  S P Otto; N H Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.