Literature DB >> 8119065

Perception of quality of life before and after disclosure of trial results: a report from the Program on the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias (POSCH).

H Buchwald1, L L Fitch, J P Matts, J W Johnson, B J Hansen, M R Stuenkel, H B Brooks.   

Abstract

The Program on the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias (POSCH) was a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to ascertain whether cholesterol lowering induced by the partial ileal bypass operation would favorably affect overall mortality and the mortality and morbidity due to coronary heart disease. The trial results provided strong clinical and coronary arteriographic support for the beneficial effects of lipid modification for the reduction of atherosclerosis progression. At the same time, the surgery-assigned group experienced diarrhea and an increased incidence of kidney stones and gallstones compared to the control-assigned group. Identical quality of life determinations were performed in the POSCH study population shortly before disclosure of the trial results to the patients and shortly thereafter. The purpose of this dual assessment was to evaluate the effect of knowledge of outcomes on the patients' subjective evaluation of quality of life. The primary instrument utilized for analysis of the perception of quality of life in POSCH was the McMasters Health Index Questionnaire (MHIQ). In addition, four study-specific questions were asked of the trial patients. The results for the MHIQ before disclosure of trial results showed a difference (p = 0.07) favoring the control-assigned group (diet-treated), for the social function index of the MHIQ. After disclosure of the trial results, the difference was larger (p < 0.05). For the four study-specific questions, all differences favored the control-assigned group (p < 0.01) before and after disclosure of the trial results, with the exception of satisfaction with randomization allocation in the surgery-assigned group (p = 0.08). The intragroup MHIQ indices before and after disclosure of the trial results showed no suggestive significant differences, except in the surgery-assigned group, in which there was an improvement in the emotional function index after disclosure of the trial results (p = 0.03). The intragroup responses to the study-specific questions before and after disclosure of the trial results again showed no significant differences, except in the surgery-assigned group, in which there was an improvement in patient satisfaction with randomization allocation after disclosure of the trial results (p = 0.04).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8119065     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(93)90030-h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  6 in total

1.  Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study.

Authors:  C Snowdon; J Garcia; D Elbourne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-04

2.  Providing research results to participants: attitudes and needs of adolescents and parents of children with cancer.

Authors:  Conrad Vincent Fernandez; Jun Gao; Caron Strahlendorf; Albert Moghrabi; Rebecca Davis Pentz; Raymond Carlton Barfield; Justin Nathaniel Baker; Darcy Santor; Charles Weijer; Eric Kodish
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Participants' experiences of being debriefed to placebo allocation in a clinical trial.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; Eric E Jacobson; Jessica Shaw; Ted J Kaptchuk
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2012-06-06

4.  Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.

Authors:  David I Shalowitz; Franklin G Miller
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 11.069

5.  Participant preferences for the provision of registration trials results.

Authors:  Soichiro Tajima; Akiyo Akaishi; Toshiko Miyamoto; Rumi Katashima; Kenichi Nakai; Takao Mitsui; Hiroaki Yanagawa
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2013-08-05

6.  Testing approaches to sharing trial results with participants: The Show RESPECT cluster randomised, factorial, mixed methods trial.

Authors:  Annabelle South; Nalinie Joharatnam-Hogan; Cara Purvis; Elizabeth C James; Carlos Diaz-Montana; William J Cragg; Conor Tweed; Archie Macnair; Matthew R Sydes; Claire Snowdon; Katie Gillies; Talia Isaacs; Barbara E Bierer; Andrew J Copas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 11.069

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.