Literature DB >> 8118970

A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty. Cost-effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life.

C H Rorabeck1, R B Bourne, A Laupacis, D Feeny, C Wong, P Tugwell, K Leslie, R Bullas.   

Abstract

The success of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is dependent on many more parameters than simply the prosthesis used. This study has demonstrated that a randomized controlled clinical trial of 250 patients comparing two types of hip prostheses (cemented versus cementless) with virtually complete follow-up examination is feasible. It also demonstrates that patients are willing to answer extensive quality-of-life questionnaires that allow complete assessment of the impact of hip arthroplasty on the patient's overall health-related quality of life. This study has also demonstrated that THA is an extremely effective intervention when one assesses its ability to impact on patients health-related quality of life with no difference between cement versus cementless at two years' follow-up examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8118970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  18 in total

Review 1.  EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hip osteoarthritis: report of a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

Authors:  W Zhang; M Doherty; N Arden; B Bannwarth; J Bijlsma; K-P Gunther; H J Hauselmann; G Herrero-Beaumont; K Jordan; P Kaklamanis; B Leeb; M Lequesne; S Lohmander; B Mazieres; E Martin-Mola; K Pavelka; A Pendleton; L Punzi; B Swoboda; R Varatojo; G Verbruggen; I Zimmermann-Gorska; M Dougados
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Quality of life and functional ability in hip and knee replacements: a prospective study.

Authors:  P Rissanen; S Aro; H Sintonen; P Slätis; P Paavolainen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  A primer on lower extremity outcome measurement instruments.

Authors:  C L Saltzman; C Mueller; K Zwior-Maron; R D Hoffman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1998

Review 4.  Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Dean Pakvis; Gijs van Hellemondt; Enrico de Visser; Wilco Jacobs; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  On the generalizability of statistical expressions of health related quality of life instrument responsiveness: a data synthesis.

Authors:  M M Murawski; P A Miederhoff
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Economic evaluation of the management of pain in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P Tugwell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kristoff Corten; Robert B Bourne; Kory D Charron; Keegan Au; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Assessing the value of a total joint replacement.

Authors:  David B Bumpass; Ryan M Nunley
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-12

9.  Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: is there a difference?

Authors:  Robert B Bourne; Bert Chesworth; Aileen Davis; Nizar Mahomed; Kory Charron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Donald S Garbuz; Michael Tanzer; Nelson V Greidanus; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.